The slow vs. fast timeout stuff is really just an implementation
detail. Let's not spread that terminology in random timeout defines.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251106152049.21115-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
XELPDP_MSGBUS_TIMEOUT_FAST_US looks to be just an obfuscated version
of the default 2 microsecond fast timeout used by
intel_wait_for_register(). Get rid of it to make it clear what's going
on here.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251106152049.21115-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
There was a completely unjustified change to the cx0 powerdown
timeout, and the way it was done now prevents future conversion
to poll_timeout_us().
Assuming there was some reason the bigger timeout let's nuke
the old short timeout (XELPDP_PORT_POWERDOWN_UPDATE_TIMEOUT_US)
nd replace it with the bigger timeout
(XELPDP_PORT_POWERDOWN_UPDATE_TIMEOUT_MS).
For consistency with intel_wait_for_register() we'll stick to the
default 2 usec for the fast timeout.
v2: Go for the longer (ms) timeout in case it actually matters
v3: Note the defaullt 2 usec fast timeout (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251106152049.21115-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
The actual timeout used isn't particularly interesting, so
don't print it. Makes the code simpler.
The debugs are also using some random capitalizaton rule.
Clean that up a bit while at it.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251106152049.21115-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
The actual timeout used isn't particularly interesting, so
don't print it. Makes the code simpler.
The debugs are also using some random capitalizaton rule.
Clean that up a bit while at it.
Also intel_cx0_powerdown_change_sequence() used one timeout
in the actual code but printed a different one.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251106152049.21115-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
The i915_gem_object_get_frontbuffer() name is rather confusing wrt.
intel_frontbuffer_get(). Rename to i915_gem_object_frontbuffer_lookup()
to make things less confusing.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016185408.22735-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
The current attempted split between xe/i915 vs. display
for intel_frontbuffer is a mess:
- the i915 rcu leaks through the interface to the display side
- the obj->frontbuffer write-side is now protected by a display
specific spinlock even though the actual obj->framebuffer
pointer lives in a i915 specific structure
- the kref is getting poked directly from both sides
- i915_active is still on the display side
Clean up the mess by moving everything about the frontbuffer
lifetime management to the i915/xe side:
- the rcu usage is now completely contained in i915
- frontbuffer_lock is moved into i915
- kref is on the i915/xe side (xe needs the refcount as well
due to intel_frontbuffer_queue_flush()->intel_frontbuffer_ref())
- the bo (and its refcounting) is no longer on the display side
- i915_active is contained in i915
I was pondering whether we could do this in some kind of smaller
steps, and perhaps we could, but it would probably have to start
with a bunch of reverts (which for sure won't go cleanly anymore).
So not convinced it's worth the hassle.
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016185408.22735-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
After upcoming intel_frontbuffer lifetime related changes we
won't need intel_frontbuffer::obj for anything apart from
getting at the display. Add a direct pointer for that instead
so that the obj pointer can be completely eliminated.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016185408.22735-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
I want to hide the kref from the high level frontbuffer code.
To that end abstract the kref_get() in intel_frontbuffer_queue_flush()
(which is the only high level function that needs this) as a new
intel_frontbuffer_ref().
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016185408.22735-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Our fb_tracking.lock is serving a double duty:
- protects fb_tracking.busy_bits
- provides the write-side protection for obj->frontbuffer
Split obj->frontbuffer role into a separate lock so that
we can clean up the current mess with the frontbuffer lifetime
management.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016185408.22735-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
intel_bo_frontbuffer_flush_for_display() is a bit too low level
to be directly in the high level dirtyfb code. Move the calls
into intel_frontbuffer_flush().
There is a slight behavioural change here in that we now skip
the flush if the bo is not a current scanout buffer (front->bits
== 0). But that is fine as the flush will eventually happen via
the fb pinning code if/when the bo becomes a scanout buffer again.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016185408.22735-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Convert intel_bo_flush_if_display() to be an operation on the
frontbuffer object rather than the underlying gem bo. This
will help with cleaning up the frontbuffer xe/i915 vs. display
split.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016185408.22735-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Get rid of intel_frontbuffer_flip_{prepare,complete}() (and
the accompanying flip_bits) since they are unused.
I suppose these could technically provide a minor optimization
over intel_frontbuffer_flip() in that the flush would get
deferred further if new rendering were to sneak in between the
prepare() and complete() calls. But for correctness it should
not make any difference since another flush will anyway follow
once the new rendering finishes.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016185408.22735-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Get rid of intel_frontbuffer_flip_{prepare,complete}() from
the overlay code and just use intel_frontbuffer_flip() instead.
The only difference between these are the light interactions
with the ORIGIN_CS busyness tracking, but since the only user
of this is the overlay/xf86-video-intel/Xv the buffer will
always be filled by the CPU and thus we'll never see any
ORIGIN_CS frontbuffer activity there anyway. Also I don't
think we actually have anything covered by the frontbuffer
tracking that affects the overlay (FBC is on the primary
plane, DRRS isn't currently enabled on the platforms with
overlay, and PSR doesn't exist in the hardware).
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016185408.22735-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
I don't even know why we have this DIRTYFB flush in the overlay
code. We'll anyway call intel_frontbuffer_flip() so there should
be no need to pretend that this is some kind of frontbuffer only
rendering operation.
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016185408.22735-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
First, we can't assume pipe == crtc index. If a pipe is fused off in
between, it no longer holds. intel_crtc_for_pipe() is the only proper
way to get from a pipe to the corresponding crtc.
Second, drivers aren't supposed to access or index drm->vblank[]
directly. There's drm_crtc_vblank_crtc() for this.
Use both functions to fix the pipe to vblank conversion.
Fixes: f02658c46c ("drm/i915/psr: Add mechanism to notify PSR of pipe enable/disable")
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.16+
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251106200000.1455164-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Xe3p_LPD updated fields of registers MBUS_CTL and DBUF_CTL to
accommodate for higher MDCLK:CDCLK ratios. Update the code to use the
new fields.
The field MBUS_TRANSLATION_THROTTLE_MIN_MASK was changed from range
[15:13] to [16:13]. Since bit 16 is not reserved in previous display
IPs and already used for something else, we can't simply extend the mask
definition to include it, but rather define an Xe3p-specific mask and
select the correct one to use based on the IP version.
Similarly, DBUF_MIN_TRACKER_STATE_SERVICE_MASK was changed from range
[18:16] to [20:16]. For the same reasons stated above, it needs a
Xe3p-specific mask definition.
v2:
- Keep definitions in the same line (i.e. without line continuation
breaks) for better readability. (Jani)
v3:
- Keep mask fields sorted by the upper limit. (Matt)
- Extend commit message to indicate why we need Xe3p-specific
definitions of the masks instead of just extending the existing
ones. (Matt)
Bspec: 68868, 68872
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ravi Kumar Vodapalli <ravi.kumar.vodapalli@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-18-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
When reading memory latencies for watermark calculations, previous
display releases instructed to apply an adjustment of adding a certain
value (e.g. 6us) to all levels when the level 0's memory latency read
from hardware was zero.
For Xe3p_LPD, the instruction is to always use 6us for level 0 and to
add that value to the other levels. Add the necessary code in
sanitize_wm_latency() so that WaWmMemoryReadLatency is always applied
for Xe3p_LPD and beyond.
v2:
- Rebased after addition of prep patch "drm/i915/wm: Reorder
adjust_wm_latency() for Xe3_LPD" (dropped in v3).
v3:
- Back to the simpler approach of doing the 'wm[0] = 0' step without
modifying the rest of the code, and that inside
sanitize_wm_latency(). (Matt Roper, Ville)
Bspec: 68986, 69126
Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-20-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Starting with Xe3p_LPD, we now have a new field in MEM_SS_INFO_GLOBAL
that indicates whether the memory has enabled ECC that limits display
bandwidth. Add the field ecc_impacting_de_bw to struct dram_info to
contain that information and set it appropriately when probing for
memory info.
Currently there are no instructions in Bspec on how to handle that case,
so let's throw a warning if we ever find such a scenario.
v2:
- s/ecc_impacting_de/ecc_impacting_de_bw/ to be more specific. (Matt
Atwood)
- Add warning if ecc_impacting_de_bw is true, since we currently do
not have instructions on how to handle it. (Matt Roper)
v3:
- Check on ecc_impacting_de_bw for the warning only for Xe3p_LPD and
beyond.
- Change warning macro from drm_WARN_ON_ONCE() to drm_WARN_ON().
Bspec: 69131
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-15-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Starting from display version 35, we don't need to use method1 to
calculate the watermark values anymore, so skip it.
Bspec: 68985
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shekhar Chauhan <shekhar.chauhan@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-14-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Xe3p_LPD has the same behavior as for Xe3_LPD with respect to DMC
context data for pipes C and D, which are lost when their power wells
are disabled. As such, let's extend the condition for Xe3_LPD in
need_pipedmc_load_mmio() to also catch Xe3p_LPD.
Bspec: 68851
Reviewed-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-13-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Disable support for odd panning and size in y direction when running on
display version 35 and using semiplanar formats.
Bspec: 68903
Signed-off-by: Juha-pekka Heikkila <juha-pekka.heikkila@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-12-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Interlace mode is officially removed from HW from Xe3p_LPD. The
register TRANS_VSYNCSHIFT and the bits in TRANS_CONF are now removed, so
make sure we do not set/get these anymore.
Bspec: 69961, 70000
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-10-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Add CDCLK table for Xe3p_LPD.
Just as with Xe3_LPD, we don't need to send voltage index info in the
PMDemand message, so we are able to re-use xe3lpd_cdclk_funcs.
With the new CDCLK table, we also need to update the maximum CDCLK value
returned by intel_update_max_cdclk().
Bspec: 68861, 68863
Reviewed-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-8-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
With Xe3p_LPD, the SKL_BOTTOM_COLOR_GAMMA_ENABLE and
SKL_BOTTOM_COLOR_CSC_ENABLE bits are being removed. Thus, we need not
set gamma_enable nor csc_enable in crtc_state.
Note that GAMMA_MODE.POST_CSC_GAMMA_ENABLE and CSC_MODE.ICL_CSC_ENABLE
are the documented alternatives for the bottom color bits being removed.
But as these suggested bits are being checked in state checker as part
of gamma_mode, csc_mode fields and as gamma_enable/csc_enable are not
being used anywhere else functionally post ICL, we need not set these
fields in crtc_state.
Bspec: 69734
Signed-off-by: Sai Teja Pottumuttu <sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-7-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Starting from Xe3p_LPD, linear surfaces also support horizontal flip.
Bspec: 68904
Signed-off-by: Sai Teja Pottumuttu <sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-6-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
On Xe3p_LPD, the dbuf blocks fields of different registers are now
documented as 13-bit fields. The dbuf isn't really large enough to need
the 13th bit, but let's go ahead and update the definition now just in
case some new display IP in future ends up needing the larger size. The
extra bit is an unused bit in previous display versions, so we can
safely just extend the existing definition.
Bspec: 69847, 69880, 72053
Signed-off-by: Sai Teja Pottumuttu <sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-5-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Bandwidth parameters for Xe3p_LPD are the same as for Xe3_LPD. Re-use
them.
Since handling for Xe3_LPD version 30.02 is more like a special case,
let's use a "== 3002" check for it inside the ">= 30" branch instead of
adding a new branch for version 35. That allows us to re-use the ">=
30" branch for Xe3p_LPD.
v2:
- Do not have a special case for ecc_impacting_de_bw, since there are
no specific instructions in Bspec for this scenario. (Matt Roper)
v3:
- Re-use the ">= 30" branch in the if-ladder. (Matt Roper)
Bspec: 68859
Signed-off-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-4-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Looking at the current if-ladder in intel_bw_init_hw(), we see that
Xe2_HPD contains two entries, differing only for ECC memories. Let's
improve readability by using braces and allowing adding extra conditions
for each case.
v2:
- Tweaked commit message, since we are not going to add the ECC case
for Xe3p_LPD anymore.
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-3-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
The NDE_RSTWRN_OPT has been removed on Xe3p platforms and reset option
programming is no longer necessary during display init.
Bspec: 68846, 69137
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-2-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Xe3p_LPD (display version 35) is similar to Xe2_LPD with respect to the
features described by struct intel_display_device_info, so reuse its
device descriptor.
v2:
- Add reference to Bspec 74201. (Shekhar)
Bspec: 74201, 74304
Signed-off-by: Sai Teja Pottumuttu <sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shekhar Chauhan <shekhar.chauhan@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-xe3p_lpd-basic-enabling-v3-1-00e87b510ae7@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Fixes two issues in intel_pipedmc_irq_handler():
- Removed an extra ']' in the PIPEDMC error and interrupt vector log.
- Corrected the interrupt vector log to print int_vector instead of tmp,
as tmp will be zero in this case.
Signed-off-by: Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103132337.762156-1-alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Expose key Type-C port data in i915_display_info to make it easier to
understand the port configuration and active mode, especially whether
the link is in DP-Alt or TBT-Alt, without having to scan kernel logs.
Tested in DP-Alt, TBT-Alt, SST, and MST.
Expected output:
[CONNECTOR:290:DP-2]: status: connected
TC Port: E/TC#2 mode: tbt-alt pin assignment: - max lanes: 4
physical dimensions: 600x340mm
...
[CONNECTOR:263:DP-5]: status: connected
TC Port: G/TC#4 mode: dp-alt pin assignment: C max lanes: 4
physical dimensions: 610x350mm
v2: Use drm_printer (Ville)
Lock/Unlock around the printf (Imre)
v3: Forward Declaration drm_printer struct (Jani)
v4: Handle MST connector with no active encoder (Imre)
Add a delimiter between fields and ":" after the port name (Imre)
v5: Init dig_port and use it in intel_encorder_is_tc and tc_info (Imre)
Move tc->port_name to a newline (Imre)
v6: Use intel_tc_port_lock/Unlock (Imre)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Khaled Almahallawy <khaled.almahallawy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251028190753.3089937-1-khaled.almahallawy@intel.com
Start using display parent interface for i915 runtime pm. Doing the same
for xe is done in coming changes.
v3:
- remove useless include
v2:
- use <> when including drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h
- drop checks for validity of rpm function pointers
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251030202836.1815680-6-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Implement runtime pm wrappers for xe driver and add them into display
parent interface.
v3:
- drop useless include
- drop xe_display_rpm_{get, put}_raw
v2:
- move xe_display_rpm_interface code into xe_display_rpm.c
- rename xe_rpm as xe_display_rpm
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251030202836.1815680-5-jouni.hogander@intel.com
We have differing implementations for display runtime pm in i915 and xe
drivers. Add struct of function pointers into display_parent_interface
which will contain used implementation of runtime pm.
v2:
- add _interface suffix to rpm function pointer struct
- add struct ref_tracker forward declaration
- use kernel-doc comments
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251030202836.1815680-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Let's gradually start calling i915 and xe parent, or core, drivers from
display via function pointers passed at display probe.
Going forward, the struct intel_display_parent_interface is expected to
include const pointers to sub-structs by functionality, for example:
struct intel_display_rpm {
struct ref_tracker *(*get)(struct drm_device *drm);
/* ... */
};
struct intel_display_parent_interface {
/* ... */
const struct intel_display_rpm *rpm;
};
This is a baby step towards not building display as part of both i915
and xe drivers, but rather making it an independent driver interfacing
with the two.
v3: useless include additions dropped
v2: unrelated include removal dropped
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251030202836.1815680-2-jouni.hogander@intel.com
From XE3P we can now poll if the AUX power is up or down define the
timeouts for each respectively.
Bspec: 68967
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251101032513.4171255-25-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
We need to enable and disable the Tx for each active lane after the
Non-TBT enable sequence is done.
Bspec: 74500, 74497, 74701
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251101032513.4171255-21-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Program LT Phy voltage swing using the Swing tables and plug in the
function at encoder->set_signal_level
Bspec: 74493
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251101032513.4171255-20-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Hook up the LT Phy enable and disable sequences using encoder->
enable/disable_clock and reusing the TBT enable disable sequence from
cx0 PHY since it remains the same.
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251101032513.4171255-18-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
