With luminance_set which represents PANEL_LUMINANCE_OVERRIDE, we
have another variable to decide if we use PWM or DPCD.
Make drm_dbg_kms log represent that.
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260302040613.3324049-7-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
intel_dp_aux_supports_hdr_backlight() prints debug message for
intel HDR backlight version. This is fine when dealing with eDP 1.4b
and lower. When we are talking about eDP 1.5 it causes confusion in
logs since we need to use VESA AUX backlight functions but this
print causes confusion as to which path code take.
Short circuit this function with a eDP version check. Make sure this
is only called if eDP <= 1.4b
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260302040613.3324049-6-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Convert the direct i915_overlay_*() calls from the display
side to go over a new parent interface instead.
v2: Correctly handle the ERR_PTR returned by
i915_overlay_obj_lookup() (Jani)
v3: Rebase due to the NULL check in intel_overlay_cleanup()
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260226130150.16816-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Relocate the i915 driver specific parts of the overlay code
into i915_overlay.c. This leaves intel_overlay.c with just
the display specific code.
The one annoyance here is the DSPCLK_GATE_D register access
being done from i830_overlay_clock_gating(). The register
definition lives on the display side as we do need to access
it on other platforms there. Since it's just one register
and bit, I decided to just duplicate that part in i915_reg.h.
v2: Use kzalloc_obj()
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260226133855.17690-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
We don't generally want fetch_and_zero() on the display side, so
stop using it in the display side intel_overlay_cleanup().
Fortunately we don't really have anything to do here apart from
freeing the data. And we'll keep on clearing the pointer, just
in case something somewhere cares about it.
Note that once i915_overlay_cleanup() is converted to the parent
interface we can't call it unconditionally (as xe won't have it).
So we need to keep the early bailout for overlay==NULL.
v2: Adjust the commit message since we do apparently
have fetch_and_zero() in display code as well (Jani)
v3: Skip i915_overlay_cleanup() if the overlay wasn't initialized
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260226130113.16714-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Split the i915 driver specific bits from 'struct intel_overlay'
into a seaarate 'struct i915_overlay'. The latter will move to
the i915 side of the parent vs. display driver split.
The display side will also need to know the virtual address of
the register map. That now gets passed as the return value
from i915_overlay_setup(), so that the display side doesn't
need to know how the mapping was achieved.
v2: Use kzalloc_obj()
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260226100738.29997-17-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
i830_overlay_clock_gating() will remain on the i915 side of the
parent vs. display driver split. Stop using display specific stuff
inside it.
The one annoyance here is access to the display engine's
DSPCLK_GATE_D register. The proper way to deal with that might
be to move it to the display side, but that seems a bit hard right
now. So leave it where it is for now.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260226100738.29997-15-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Adjust the names ("i915_overlay_" prefix) and calling
convention (pass the driver agnostic 'struct drm_device'()
of the functions that will provide the remainder of the
parent driver interface to be used by the overlay display
code.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260226100738.29997-14-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Some of the lower level functions in the overlay code will
move to the i915 side of the upcoming parent vs. display
driver split. Move all such functions to the "i915_overlay_"
namespace to make it easier to see what belongs where.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260226100738.29997-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Make the buffer (un)pinning a bit more abstract so that
the display side of the code doesn't need to know about i915
specific things (i915_ggtt_offset() and i915_vma_unpin()).
In preparation for the full parent vs. display driver split
we'll also pass in the drm_device to these functions, although
not strictly needed yet.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260226100738.29997-12-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Pull the i915 specific bits of the overlay cleanup into
a separate function (i915_overlay_cleanup()) to accommodate
the upcoming parent vs. display driver split.
For now we'll also have to pass in the overlay struct, but
that will disappear once the i915 vs. display split is completed.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260226100738.29997-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Pull the gem/gt related bits of the overlay setup into
a separate function (i915_overlay_setup()) that will eventually
move to the i915 side of the parent vs. display driver split.
For now we'll also have to pass in the overlay struct, but
that will disappear once the i915 vs. display split is completed.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260226100738.29997-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
overlay->frontbuffer_bits tracking will move to the i915 side
of the parent vs. display driver split, so extract the reset
part of that into a new function (i915_overlay_reset()).
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260226100738.29997-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Use 'struct drm_gem_object' for the BO instead of 'struct
drm_i915_gem_object', to avoid having the display side
know anything about the i915 specific BO type.
v2: Correctly handle the ERR_PTR returned by
i915_overlay_obj_lookup() (Jani)
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260226100738.29997-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Extract the BO lookup and tiling check into a new
helper called i915_overlay_obj_lookup(). This will have to
move to the i915 side of the parent vs. display driver split.
There is a slight change here in that we now do the tiling
check before taking the modeset locks, but those locks don't
protect the BO tiling stuff in any way, so nothing is really
different here.
Note that the hardware should support X-tiled scanout also
for the overlay, but I guess no one ever bothered to hook
it up and test it. So the check should stay at least for now.
v2: Correctly handle the ERR_PTR returned by
i915_overlay_obj_lookup() (Jani)
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260226100738.29997-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Move the underrun check out from intel_overlay_continue()
so that the DOVSTA register access can stay on the display
side of the parent vs. display driver split.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260226100738.29997-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Pull the "is the overlay active?" check to a helper
(i915_overlay_is_active()). This will have to move to the
i915 side of the parent vs. display driver split.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260226100738.29997-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Store the current frontbuffer_bits in the overlay data. The
main benefit here is that we get rid of the 'crtc->pipe'
usage from intel_overlay_flip_prepare() which will have to
move to the i915 side of the parent vs. display driver split.
And since the goal is to get rid of the crtc stuff, move those
out from intel_overlay_off_tail() into intel_overlay_switch_off()
since the i915 side doesn't use those anymore, and the display
side doesn't need those anymore after that anyway.
intel_overlay_off_tail() will itself move to the i915 side of
the fence once the driver split is done.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260226100738.29997-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
The overlay snapshot stuff is a bit annoying because some of
it more or less of belongs on the gt side, and some on the
display side. Remove the whole thing to avoid having to deal
with it when splitting the overlay code around the i915
vs. display boundary. I don't think I've ever actually used
this for anything, so no real loss from my POV. And it can
always be resurrected later should the need arise.
v2: Rebase due to kmalloc_obj()
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260226100738.29997-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Some panels need VESA DPCD AUX backlight but VBT says otherwise.
This is why we try with Intel backlight interface over VESA backlight
interface. This causes a blankout on such panels without any fallback
mechanism.
Remove try_vesa_interface and use VESA AUX backlight interface as a
fallback mechanism.
While at in sneak in a small comment cleanup too.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/15679
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260224031322.2568874-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
struct i915_address_space is used in an opaque fashion in the display
parent interface, but it's just one include away from being
non-opaque. And anyway the name is rather specific.
Switch to using the struct intel_dpt instead, which embeds struct
i915_address_space anyway. With the definition hidden in i915_dpt.c,
this can't be accidentally made non-opaque, and the type seems rather
more generic anyway.
We do have to add a new helper i915_dpt_to_vm(), as there's one case in
intel_fb_pin_to_dpt() that requires direct access to struct
i915_address_space. But this just underlines the point about opacity.
Reviewed-by: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/daa39178c0b0305b010564952d691f06e3cd63ca.1772030909.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Rename struct i915_dpt to intel_dpt. This may seem rather inconsistent
considering we just renamed the functions the other way round, but the
intent here is to lift struct intel_dpt to the display parent interface
as the generic opaque type for DPT instead of the very specific struct
i915_address_space.
Reviewed-by: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/afb89dcce35c5b0cff2007b58d6ee20fd3200c24.1772030909.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
The remaining functions declared in intel_dpt.h are i915 specific, and
so are the users, so we can move them to i915_dpt.h. There are some
useless intel_dpt.h includes around that we can remove.
Reviewed-by: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/de16eddbb49110b56ff44899d9498e3081da91fa.1772030909.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Split the size determination between caller and callee to drop the
dependency on struct intel_framebuffer from DPT code, but avoid adding a
dependency on I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE in the caller side.
Pass zero size to let intel_dpt_create() handle the regular obj->size
case, but remapped size if fb needs stride remap.
Reviewed-by: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/3a6e987ce8bb9f2c8d90c35342de14494a64de1b.1772030909.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Detecting a bandwidth change for a sink connected through a DP tunnel
depends on updating the sink's DPRX link rate and lane count.
detect_new_tunnel() -> update_tunnel_state() updates the link
configuration only if the tunnel state changes. However, after the
tunnel is created and bandwidth allocation mode is enabled, the tunnel
state itself may remain unchanged.
Record the sink bandwidth before creating the tunnel and compare it to
the bandwidth after tunnel creation and enabling bandwidth allocation
mode, ensuring that any bandwidth change is detected and userspace is
notified accordingly.
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260219182823.926702-6-imre.deak@intel.com
Split update_tunnel_state() into two helpers: one that updates the
tunnel state, and another that detects whether the tunnel bandwidth
has changed.
This prepares for a follow-up change that needs to compare the current
bandwidth against the value from before the DP tunnel was detected and
bandwidth allocation mode was enabled.
While at it, document the return value of update_tunnel_state().
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260219182823.926702-4-imre.deak@intel.com
update_tunnel_state() checks whether a tunnel state change (e.g.
available tunnel bandwidth) affects the list of valid modes for the
sink connected through the tunnel. If so, its caller sends a hotplug
event so userspace can re-enumerate the modes.
A change in tunnel bandwidth does not affect the mode list if the
bandwidth was above the sink's DPRX bandwidth both before and after the
update, since in that case the effective bandwidth remains limited by
the DPRX.
As get_current_link_bw() via intel_dp_max_link_data_rate() already
returns bandwidth values clamped to the DPRX limit, the condition for
detecting a mode list change can be simplified to:
old_bw != new_bw
Remove the explicit checks for whether the bandwidth was below the
maximum DPRX bandwidth before and after the update, and rely on the
clamped bandwidth values instead.
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260219182823.926702-3-imre.deak@intel.com
During system resume, restoring the pre-suspend display state must not
fail. This requires preserving the sink capabilities from before
suspend, including the available link bandwidth.
If these capabilities are not preserved, the restore modeset may fail,
either due to a missing sink capability or insufficient link bandwidth
for the restored mode.
When the sink is connected through a DP tunnel, prevent such capability
changes by skipping tunnel state updates during resume. This also avoids
updating the sink state via the tunnel while it is being resumed.
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260219182823.926702-2-imre.deak@intel.com
If stolen memory cannot be allocated for the fbdev because of the
preference for fbc, have an info about that in the log.
v2: log text changed
Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260220170908.201422-7-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com
If stolen memory cannot be allocated for the fbdev and initial plane
bo because of the preference for fbc, have an info about that in
the log.
v2: log text changed
Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260220170908.201422-6-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com
Pull the "should we keep the bios fb in stolen?" logic into
into a helper function, same as was done for i915. Gives us
a single place where to tweak the heuristics.
v2: changes related to rebase and consolidated other conditions
for the stolen preference into this single function (Vinod)
v3: avoid including intel_display_core.h (Jani Nikula)
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260220170908.201422-5-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com
Consolidate the "should we allocate fbdev fb in stolen?"
check into a helper function. Makes it easier to change the
heuristics without having to change so many places.
v2: rebase related changes and consolidate all the prefer
stolen conditions into a single function (Vinod)
v3: avoid including intel_display_core.h (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260220170908.201422-4-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com
Looks like stolen->size is in bytes, not pages. Remove the
bogus PAGE_SHIFT stuff.
Also for some random reason xe rejects the FB if it takes up
exactly half of stolen, whereas i915 allows it to be used
in that case. Adjust xe to follow the i915 rule for consistency.
v2: rebase related updates
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260220170908.201422-2-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com
On top the timeouts mentioned in the spec which includes only the PHY
timeouts include the SoC and the OS turnaround time.
The overhead value is based on the stress test results with multiple
available panels.
Signed-off-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260216-timeout-v3-2-055522c22560@intel.com
The port refclk enable timeout and the soc ready timeout value mentioned
in the spec is the PHY timings and doesn't include the turnaround time
from the SoC or OS. So add an overhead timeout value on top of the
recommended timeouts from the PHY spec.
The overhead value is based on the stress test results with multiple
available panels.
Reported-by: Cole Leavitt <cole@unwrap.rs>
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/14713
Signed-off-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260216-timeout-v3-1-055522c22560@intel.com
