device property: Refactor to use RAII approach

In a couple of functions code can be made cleaner with help of
__free() macro. Refactor these to use RAII approach.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260611203537.1786399-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Andy Shevchenko 2026-06-11 22:31:07 +02:00 committed by Danilo Krummrich
parent 1900692555
commit c37ab60d55

View File

@ -7,10 +7,10 @@
* Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
*/
#include <linux/cleanup.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/kconfig.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/property.h>
#include <linux/phy.h>
@ -517,7 +517,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_property_read_string);
int fwnode_property_match_string(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
const char *propname, const char *string)
{
const char **values;
int nval, ret;
nval = fwnode_property_string_array_count(fwnode, propname);
@ -527,20 +526,18 @@ int fwnode_property_match_string(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
if (nval == 0)
return -ENODATA;
values = kcalloc(nval, sizeof(*values), GFP_KERNEL);
const char **values __free(kfree) = kcalloc(nval, sizeof(*values), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!values)
return -ENOMEM;
ret = fwnode_property_read_string_array(fwnode, propname, values, nval);
if (ret < 0)
goto out_free;
return ret;
ret = match_string(values, nval, string);
if (ret < 0)
ret = -ENODATA;
return -ENODATA;
out_free:
kfree(values);
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_property_match_string);
@ -1128,8 +1125,9 @@ struct fwnode_handle *
fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
struct fwnode_handle *prev)
{
struct fwnode_handle *ep, *port_parent = NULL;
const struct fwnode_handle *parent;
struct fwnode_handle *port_parent __free(fwnode_handle) = NULL;
struct fwnode_handle *ep;
/*
* If this function is in a loop and the previous iteration returned
@ -1147,13 +1145,9 @@ fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
ep = fwnode_call_ptr_op(parent, graph_get_next_endpoint, prev);
if (ep)
goto out_put_port_parent;
return ep;
ep = fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(parent->secondary, NULL);
out_put_port_parent:
fwnode_handle_put(port_parent);
return ep;
return fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(parent->secondary, NULL);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint);