From c37ab60d55e34ed0fd050926abd602bb31a5036d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 22:31:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] device property: Refactor to use RAII approach

In a couple of functions code can be made cleaner with help of
__free() macro. Refactor these to use RAII approach.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260611203537.1786399-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/base/property.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c
index e0f570f48bc3..b136c339ddae 100644
--- a/drivers/base/property.c
+++ b/drivers/base/property.c
@@ -7,10 +7,10 @@
  *          Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
  */
 
+#include <linux/cleanup.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/export.h>
-#include <linux/kconfig.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/property.h>
 #include <linux/phy.h>
@@ -517,7 +517,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_property_read_string);
 int fwnode_property_match_string(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
 	const char *propname, const char *string)
 {
-	const char **values;
 	int nval, ret;
 
 	nval = fwnode_property_string_array_count(fwnode, propname);
@@ -527,20 +526,18 @@ int fwnode_property_match_string(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
 	if (nval == 0)
 		return -ENODATA;
 
-	values = kcalloc(nval, sizeof(*values), GFP_KERNEL);
+	const char **values __free(kfree) = kcalloc(nval, sizeof(*values), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!values)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	ret = fwnode_property_read_string_array(fwnode, propname, values, nval);
 	if (ret < 0)
-		goto out_free;
+		return ret;
 
 	ret = match_string(values, nval, string);
 	if (ret < 0)
-		ret = -ENODATA;
+		return -ENODATA;
 
-out_free:
-	kfree(values);
 	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_property_match_string);
@@ -1128,8 +1125,9 @@ struct fwnode_handle *
 fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
 			       struct fwnode_handle *prev)
 {
-	struct fwnode_handle *ep, *port_parent = NULL;
 	const struct fwnode_handle *parent;
+	struct fwnode_handle *port_parent __free(fwnode_handle) = NULL;
+	struct fwnode_handle *ep;
 
 	/*
 	 * If this function is in a loop and the previous iteration returned
@@ -1147,13 +1145,9 @@ fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
 
 	ep = fwnode_call_ptr_op(parent, graph_get_next_endpoint, prev);
 	if (ep)
-		goto out_put_port_parent;
+		return ep;
 
-	ep = fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(parent->secondary, NULL);
-
-out_put_port_parent:
-	fwnode_handle_put(port_parent);
-	return ep;
+	return fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(parent->secondary, NULL);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint);