[ Upstream commit ed8029d7b4 ]
RCU complains about us calling printk() from an offline CPU:
=============================
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
5.12.0-rc7-02874-g7cf90e481cb8 #1 Not tainted
-----------------------------
kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3568 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
other info that might help us debug this:
RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
no locks held by swapper/0/0.
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc7-02874-g7cf90e481cb8 #1
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0xec/0x144 (unreliable)
lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x124/0x144
__lock_acquire+0x1098/0x28b0
lock_acquire+0x128/0x600
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x6c/0xc0
down_trylock+0x2c/0x70
__down_trylock_console_sem+0x60/0x140
vprintk_emit+0x1a8/0x4b0
vprintk_func+0xcc/0x200
printk+0x40/0x54
pseries_cpu_offline_self+0xc0/0x120
arch_cpu_idle_dead+0x54/0x70
do_idle+0x174/0x4a0
cpu_startup_entry+0x38/0x40
rest_init+0x268/0x388
start_kernel+0x748/0x790
start_here_common+0x1c/0x614
Which happens because by the time we get to rtas_stop_self() we are
already offline. In addition the message can be spammy, and is not that
helpful for users, so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210418135413.1204031-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
d98b03bfd0