The new pid inode number allocation scheme is neat but I overlooked a
possible, even though unlikely, attack that can be used to trigger an
overflow on both 32bit and 64bit.
An unique 64 bit identifier was constructed for each struct pid by two
combining a 32 bit idr with a 32 bit generation number. A 32bit number
was allocated using the idr_alloc_cyclic() infrastructure. When the idr
wrapped around a 32 bit wraparound counter was incremented. The 32 bit
wraparound counter served as the upper 32 bits and the allocated idr
number as the lower 32 bits.
Since the idr can only allocate up to INT_MAX entries everytime a
wraparound happens INT_MAX - 1 entries are lost (Ignoring that numbering
always starts at 2 to avoid theoretical collisions with the root inode
number.).
If userspace fully populates the idr such that and puts itself into
control of two entries such that one entry is somewhere in the middle
and the other entry is the INT_MAX entry then it is possible to overflow
the wraparound counter. That is probably difficult to pull off but the
mere possibility is annoying.
The problem could be contained to 32 bit by switching to a data
structure such as the maple tree that allows allocating 64 bit numbers
on 64 bit machines. That would leave 32 bit in a lurch but that probably
doesn't matter that much. The other problem is that removing entries
form the maple tree is somewhat non-trivial because the removal code can
be called under the irq write lock of tasklist_lock and
irq{save,restore} code.
Instead, allocate unique identifiers for struct pid by simply
incrementing a 64 bit counter and insert each struct pid into the rbtree
so it can be looked up to decode file handles avoiding to leak actual
pids across pid namespaces in file handles.
On both 64 bit and 32 bit the same 64 bit identifier is used to lookup
struct pid in the rbtree. On 64 bit the unique identifier for struct pid
simply becomes the inode number. Comparing two pidfds continues to be as
simple as comparing inode numbers.
On 32 bit the 64 bit number assigned to struct pid is split into two 32
bit numbers. The lower 32 bits are used as the inode number and the
upper 32 bits are used as the inode generation number. Whenever a
wraparound happens on 32 bit the 64 bit number will be incremented by 2
so inode numbering starts at 2 again.
When a wraparound happens on 32 bit multiple pidfds with the same inode
number are likely to exist. This isn't a problem since before pidfs
pidfds used the anonymous inode meaning all pidfds had the same inode
number. On 32 bit sserspace can thus reconstruct the 64 bit identifier
by retrieving both the inode number and the inode generation number to
compare, or use file handles. This gives the same guarantees on both 32
bit and 64 bit.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241214-gekoppelt-erdarbeiten-a1f9a982a5a6@brauner
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
16ecd47cb0