[ Upstream commit 841aee4d75 ]
Put NVMe/TCP sockets in their own class to avoid some lockdep warnings.
Sockets created by nvme-tcp are not exposed to user-space, and will not
trigger certain code paths that the general socket API exposes.
Lockdep complains about a circular dependency between the socket and
filesystem locks, because setsockopt can trigger a page fault with a
socket lock held, but nvme-tcp sends requests on the socket while file
system locks are held.
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.15.0-rc3 #1 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
fio/1496 is trying to acquire lock:
(sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: tcp_sendpage+0x23/0x80
but task is already holding lock:
(&xfs_dir_ilock_class/5){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: xfs_ilock+0xcf/0x290 [xfs]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
other info that might help us debug this:
chain exists of:
sk_lock-AF_INET --> sb_internal --> &xfs_dir_ilock_class/5
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&xfs_dir_ilock_class/5);
lock(sb_internal);
lock(&xfs_dir_ilock_class/5);
lock(sk_lock-AF_INET);
*** DEADLOCK ***
6 locks held by fio/1496:
#0: (sb_writers#13){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: path_openat+0x9fc/0xa20
#1: (&inode->i_sb->s_type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++}-{3:3}, at: path_openat+0x296/0xa20
#2: (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: xfs_trans_alloc_icreate+0x41/0xd0 [xfs]
#3: (&xfs_dir_ilock_class/5){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: xfs_ilock+0xcf/0x290 [xfs]
#4: (hctx->srcu){....}-{0:0}, at: hctx_lock+0x51/0xd0
#5: (&queue->send_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: nvme_tcp_queue_rq+0x33e/0x380 [nvme_tcp]
This annotation lets lockdep analyze nvme-tcp controlled sockets
independently of what the user-space sockets API does.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/CAHj4cs9MDYLJ+q+2_GXUK9HxFizv2pxUryUR0toX974M040z7g@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Chris Leech <cleech@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
1c200c8bce