[ Upstream commit e4add24778 ]
optimize_kprobe() and unoptimize_kprobe() cancels if a given kprobe
is on the optimizing_list or unoptimizing_list already. However, since
the following commit:
f66c0447cc ("kprobes: Set unoptimized flag after unoptimizing code")
modified the update timing of the KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED, it doesn't
work as expected anymore.
The optimized_kprobe could be in the following states:
- [optimizing]: Before inserting jump instruction
op.kp->flags has KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED and
op->list is not empty.
- [optimized]: jump inserted
op.kp->flags has KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED and
op->list is empty.
- [unoptimizing]: Before removing jump instruction (including unused
optprobe)
op.kp->flags has KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED and
op->list is not empty.
- [unoptimized]: jump removed
op.kp->flags doesn't have KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED and
op->list is empty.
Current code mis-expects [unoptimizing] state doesn't have
KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED, and that can cause incorrect results.
To fix this, introduce optprobe_queued_unopt() to distinguish [optimizing]
and [unoptimizing] states and fixes the logic in optimize_kprobe() and
unoptimize_kprobe().
[ mingo: Cleaned up the changelog and the code a bit. ]
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: bristot@redhat.com
Fixes: f66c0447cc ("kprobes: Set unoptimized flag after unoptimizing code")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/157840814418.7181.13478003006386303481.stgit@devnote2
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
38d3707340