linux/Documentation/ABI
Linus Torvalds 5e2cb28dd7 configfs-tsm for v6.7
- Introduce configfs-tsm as a shared ABI for confidential computing
   attestation reports
 
 - Convert sev-guest to additionally support configfs-tsm alongside its
   vendor specific ioctl()
 
 - Added signed attestation report retrieval to the tdx-guest driver
   forgoing a new vendor specific ioctl()
 
 - Misc. cleanups and a new __free() annotation for kvfree()
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iHUEABYKAB0WIQSbo+XnGs+rwLz9XGXfioYZHlFsZwUCZUQhiQAKCRDfioYZHlFs
 Z2gMAQCJdtP0f2kH+pvf3oxAkA1OubKBqJqWOppeyrhTsNMpDQEA9ljXH9h7eRB/
 2NQ6USrU6jqcdu3gB5Tzq8J/ZZabMQU=
 =1Eiv
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'tsm-for-6.7' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/djbw/linux

Pull unified attestation reporting from Dan Williams:
 "In an ideal world there would be a cross-vendor standard attestation
  report format for confidential guests along with a common device
  definition to act as the transport.

  In the real world the situation ended up with multiple platform
  vendors inventing their own attestation report formats with the
  SEV-SNP implementation being a first mover to define a custom
  sev-guest character device and corresponding ioctl(). Later, this
  configfs-tsm proposal intercepted an attempt to add a tdx-guest
  character device and a corresponding new ioctl(). It also anticipated
  ARM and RISC-V showing up with more chardevs and more ioctls().

  The proposal takes for granted that Linux tolerates the vendor report
  format differentiation until a standard arrives. From talking with
  folks involved, it sounds like that standardization work is unlikely
  to resolve anytime soon. It also takes the position that kernfs ABIs
  are easier to maintain than ioctl(). The result is a shared configfs
  mechanism to return per-vendor report-blobs with the option to later
  support a standard when that arrives.

  Part of the goal here also is to get the community into the
  "uncomfortable, but beneficial to the long term maintainability of the
  kernel" state of talking to each other about their differentiation and
  opportunities to collaborate. Think of this like the device-driver
  equivalent of the common memory-management infrastructure for
  confidential-computing being built up in KVM.

  As for establishing an "upstream path for cross-vendor
  confidential-computing device driver infrastructure" this is something
  I want to discuss at Plumbers. At present, the multiple vendor
  proposals for assigning devices to confidential computing VMs likely
  needs a new dedicated repository and maintainer team, but that is a
  discussion for v6.8.

  For now, Greg and Thomas have acked this approach and this is passing
  is AMD, Intel, and Google tests.

  Summary:

   - Introduce configfs-tsm as a shared ABI for confidential computing
     attestation reports

   - Convert sev-guest to additionally support configfs-tsm alongside
     its vendor specific ioctl()

   - Added signed attestation report retrieval to the tdx-guest driver
     forgoing a new vendor specific ioctl()

   - Misc cleanups and a new __free() annotation for kvfree()"

* tag 'tsm-for-6.7' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/djbw/linux:
  virt: tdx-guest: Add Quote generation support using TSM_REPORTS
  virt: sevguest: Add TSM_REPORTS support for SNP_GET_EXT_REPORT
  mm/slab: Add __free() support for kvfree
  virt: sevguest: Prep for kernel internal get_ext_report()
  configfs-tsm: Introduce a shared ABI for attestation reports
  virt: coco: Add a coco/Makefile and coco/Kconfig
  virt: sevguest: Fix passing a stack buffer as a scatterlist target
2023-11-04 15:58:13 -10:00
..
obsolete docs: update ocfs2-devel mailing list address 2023-07-08 09:29:29 -07:00
removed docs: update ocfs2-devel mailing list address 2023-07-08 09:29:29 -07:00
stable dmaengine: idxd: add wq driver name support for accel-config user tool 2023-10-04 13:00:34 +05:30
testing configfs-tsm for v6.7 2023-11-04 15:58:13 -10:00
README docs: ABI: README: specify that files should be ReST compatible 2020-10-30 13:07:01 +01:00

This directory attempts to document the ABI between the Linux kernel and
userspace, and the relative stability of these interfaces.  Due to the
everchanging nature of Linux, and the differing maturity levels, these
interfaces should be used by userspace programs in different ways.

We have four different levels of ABI stability, as shown by the four
different subdirectories in this location.  Interfaces may change levels
of stability according to the rules described below.

The different levels of stability are:

  stable/
	This directory documents the interfaces that the developer has
	defined to be stable.  Userspace programs are free to use these
	interfaces with no restrictions, and backward compatibility for
	them will be guaranteed for at least 2 years.  Most interfaces
	(like syscalls) are expected to never change and always be
	available.

  testing/
	This directory documents interfaces that are felt to be stable,
	as the main development of this interface has been completed.
	The interface can be changed to add new features, but the
	current interface will not break by doing this, unless grave
	errors or security problems are found in them.  Userspace
	programs can start to rely on these interfaces, but they must be
	aware of changes that can occur before these interfaces move to
	be marked stable.  Programs that use these interfaces are
	strongly encouraged to add their name to the description of
	these interfaces, so that the kernel developers can easily
	notify them if any changes occur (see the description of the
	layout of the files below for details on how to do this.)

  obsolete/
	This directory documents interfaces that are still remaining in
	the kernel, but are marked to be removed at some later point in
	time.  The description of the interface will document the reason
	why it is obsolete and when it can be expected to be removed.

  removed/
	This directory contains a list of the old interfaces that have
	been removed from the kernel.

Every file in these directories will contain the following information:

What:		Short description of the interface
Date:		Date created
KernelVersion:	Kernel version this feature first showed up in.
Contact:	Primary contact for this interface (may be a mailing list)
Description:	Long description of the interface and how to use it.
Users:		All users of this interface who wish to be notified when
		it changes.  This is very important for interfaces in
		the "testing" stage, so that kernel developers can work
		with userspace developers to ensure that things do not
		break in ways that are unacceptable.  It is also
		important to get feedback for these interfaces to make
		sure they are working in a proper way and do not need to
		be changed further.


Note:
   The fields should be use a simple notation, compatible with ReST markup.
   Also, the file **should not** have a top-level index, like::

	===
	foo
	===

How things move between levels:

Interfaces in stable may move to obsolete, as long as the proper
notification is given.

Interfaces may be removed from obsolete and the kernel as long as the
documented amount of time has gone by.

Interfaces in the testing state can move to the stable state when the
developers feel they are finished.  They cannot be removed from the
kernel tree without going through the obsolete state first.

It's up to the developer to place their interfaces in the category they
wish for it to start out in.


Notable bits of non-ABI, which should not under any circumstances be considered
stable:

- Kconfig.  Userspace should not rely on the presence or absence of any
  particular Kconfig symbol, in /proc/config.gz, in the copy of .config
  commonly installed to /boot, or in any invocation of the kernel build
  process.

- Kernel-internal symbols.  Do not rely on the presence, absence, location, or
  type of any kernel symbol, either in System.map files or the kernel binary
  itself.  See Documentation/process/stable-api-nonsense.rst.