mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-06-12 16:57:59 +02:00
874f670e60
__might_sleep() vs. ___might_sleep() is hard to distinguish. Aside of that the three underscore variant is exposed to provide a checkpoint for rescheduling points which are distinct from blocking points. They are semantically a preemption point which means that scheduling is state preserving. A real blocking operation, e.g. mutex_lock(), wait*(), which cannot preserve a task state which is not equal to RUNNING. While technically blocking on a "sleeping" spinlock in RT enabled kernels falls into the voluntary scheduling category because it has to wait until the contended spin/rw lock becomes available, the RT lock substitution code can semantically be mapped to a voluntary preemption because the RT lock substitution code and the scheduler are providing mechanisms to preserve the task state and to take regular non-lock related wakeups into account. Rename ___might_sleep() to __might_resched() to make the distinction of these functions clear. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210923165357.928693482@linutronix.de |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| irqflag-debug.c | ||
| lock_events_list.h | ||
| lock_events.c | ||
| lock_events.h | ||
| lockdep_internals.h | ||
| lockdep_proc.c | ||
| lockdep_states.h | ||
| lockdep.c | ||
| locktorture.c | ||
| Makefile | ||
| mcs_spinlock.h | ||
| mutex-debug.c | ||
| mutex.c | ||
| mutex.h | ||
| osq_lock.c | ||
| percpu-rwsem.c | ||
| qrwlock.c | ||
| qspinlock_paravirt.h | ||
| qspinlock_stat.h | ||
| qspinlock.c | ||
| rtmutex_api.c | ||
| rtmutex_common.h | ||
| rtmutex.c | ||
| rwbase_rt.c | ||
| rwsem.c | ||
| semaphore.c | ||
| spinlock_debug.c | ||
| spinlock_rt.c | ||
| spinlock.c | ||
| test-ww_mutex.c | ||
| ww_mutex.h | ||
| ww_rt_mutex.c | ||