Vladimir Oltean 30296ac764 net: dsa: xrs700x: reject unsupported HSR configurations ... As discussed here: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240620090210.drop6jwh7e5qw556@skbuf/ the fact is that the xrs700x.c driver only supports offloading HSR_PT_SLAVE_A and HSR_PT_SLAVE_B (which were the only port types at the time the offload was written, _for this driver_). Up until now, the API did not explicitly tell offloading drivers what port has what role. So xrs700x can get confused and think that it can support a configuration which it actually can't. There was a table in the attached link which gave an example: $ ip link add name hsr0 type hsr slave1 swp0 slave2 swp1 \ interlink swp2 supervision 45 version 1 HSR_PT_SLAVE_A HSR_PT_SLAVE_B HSR_PT_INTERLINK ---------------------------------------------------------------- user space 0 1 2 requests ---------------------------------------------------------------- XRS700X driver 1 2 - understands The switch would act as if the ring ports were swp1 and swp2. Now that we have explicit hsr_get_port_type() API, let's use that to work around the unintended semantical changes of the offloading API brought by the introduction of interlink ports in HSR. Fixes: 5055cccfc2 ("net: hsr: Provide RedBox support (HSR-SAN)") Cc: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: George McCollister <george.mccollister@gmail.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251130131657.65080-5-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>		2025-12-01 16:45:07 -08:00
..
Kconfig
Makefile
xrs700x_i2c.c	net: Drop explicit initialization of struct i2c_device_id::driver_data to 0	2024-06-26 07:28:08 -07:00
xrs700x_mdio.c
xrs700x_reg.h
xrs700x.c	net: dsa: xrs700x: reject unsupported HSR configurations	2025-12-01 16:45:07 -08:00
xrs700x.h