Breno reported significant c2c HITM in a futex hash heavy workload.
It turns out that the hash bucket to private hash table reverse pointer
(futex_hash_bucket::priv) was to blame. Notably when the hash buckets are
heavily contended, the: 'fph = bh->priv;' load in futex_hash() will typically
miss and consequently become quite expensive.
Since this load in particular is quite superfluous, removing it is fairly
straight forward. However, removing it does not in fact achieve anything much.
The pain moves to the next user, notably: futex_hash_put().
Therefore rework the whole private hash refcounting to avoid needing this back
pointer (and removing it). Instead of passing around 'struct futex_hash_bucket
*hb', pass around a new structure that contains it and the related 'struct
futex_private_hash *fph' pointer in tandem.
Funnily this turns out to remove more code than it adds and significantly
improves futex hash performance (as measured by 'perf bench futex hash'):
SKL dual socket 112 threads:
Baseline Patched
shared (16k) 1571857 1641435 + 4.4%
autosize (512) 646390 903371 +39.7%
-b 256 464395 587014 +26.4%
-b 512 715687 995943 +39.2%
-b 1024 995085 1396328 +40.3%
-b 2048 1293114 1668395 +29.0%
-b 4096 2124438 2240228 + 5.5%
Zen3 dual socket 256 threads:
Baseline Patched
shared (16k) 1275840 1381279 + 8.2%
autosize (512) 1252745 1482179 +18.3%
-b 256 856274 955455 +11.5%
-b 512 1267490 1544010 +21.8%
-b 1024 1424013 1625424 +14.1%
-b 2048 1505181 1669342 +10.9%
-b 4096 1465993 1688932 +15.2%
AMD EPYC 9D64 (Zen4, single socket) 176 threads:
Baseline Patched Delta
shared (16k) 1,230,599 1,368,655 +11.2%
autosize (1024) 1,285,440 1,556,946 +21.1%
-b 256 1,341,471 1,520,303 +13.3%
-b 512 1,438,330 1,599,319 +11.2%
-b 1024 1,443,772 1,622,493 +12.4%
-b 2048 1,472,108 1,643,975 +11.7%
-b 4096 1,333,098 1,570,897 +17.8%
Reported-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Tested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260610135510.GB1430057@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
Unlocking robust non-PI futexes happens in user space with the following
sequence:
1) robust_list_set_op_pending(mutex);
2) robust_list_remove(mutex);
lval = 0;
3) lval = atomic_xchg(lock, lval);
4) if (lval & WAITERS)
5) sys_futex(WAKE,....);
6) robust_list_clear_op_pending();
That opens a window between #3 and #6 where the mutex could be acquired by
some other task which observes that it is the last user and:
A) unmaps the mutex memory
B) maps a different file, which ends up covering the same address
When the original task exits before reaching #6 then the kernel robust list
handling observes the pending op entry and tries to fix up user space.
In case that the newly mapped data contains the TID of the exiting thread
at the address of the mutex/futex the kernel will set the owner died bit in
that memory and therefore corrupting unrelated data.
PI futexes have a similar problem both for the non-contented user space
unlock and the in kernel unlock:
1) robust_list_set_op_pending(mutex);
2) robust_list_remove(mutex);
lval = gettid();
3) if (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(lock, lval, 0))
4) sys_futex(UNLOCK_PI,....);
5) robust_list_clear_op_pending();
Address the first part of the problem where the futexes have waiters and
need to enter the kernel anyway. Add a new FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK flag, which
is valid for the sys_futex() FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI, FUTEX_WAKE, FUTEX_WAKE_BITSET
operations.
This deliberately omits FUTEX_WAKE_OP from this treatment as it's unclear
whether this is needed and there is no usage of it in glibc either to
investigate.
For the futex2 syscall family this needs to be implemented with a new
syscall.
The sys_futex() case [ab]uses the @uaddr2 argument to hand the pointer to
robust_list_head::list_pending_op into the kernel. This argument is only
evaluated when the FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK bit is set and is therefore backward
compatible.
This is an explicit argument to avoid the lookup of the robust list pointer
and retrieving the pending op pointer from there. User space has the
pointer already available so it can just put it into the @uaddr2
argument. Aside of that this allows the usage of multiple robust lists in
the future without any changes to the internal functions as they just operate
on the provided pointer.
This requires a second flag FUTEX_ROBUST_LIST32 which indicates that the
robust list pointer points to an u32 and not to an u64. This is required
for two reasons:
1) sys_futex() has no compat variant
2) The gaming emulators use both both 64-bit and compat 32-bit robust
lists in the same 64-bit application
As a consequence 32-bit applications have to set this flag unconditionally
so they can run on a 64-bit kernel in compat mode unmodified. 32-bit
kernels return an error code when the flag is not set. 64-bit kernels will
happily clear the full 64 bits if user space fails to set it.
In case of FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI this clears the robust list pending op when the
unlock succeeded. In case of errors, the user space value is still locked
by the caller and therefore the above cannot happen.
In case of FUTEX_WAKE* this does the unlock of the futex in the kernel and
clears the robust list pending op when the unlock was successful. If not,
the user space value is still locked and user space has to deal with the
returned error. That means that the unlocking of non-PI robust futexes has
to use the same try_cmpxchg() unlock scheme as PI futexes.
If the clearing of the pending list op fails (fault) then the kernel clears
the registered robust list pointer if it matches to prevent that exit()
will try to handle invalid data. That's a valid paranoid decision because
the robust list head sits usually in the TLS and if the TLS is not longer
accessible then the chance for fixing up the resulting mess is very close
to zero.
The problem of non-contended unlocks still exists and will be addressed
separately.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260602090535.670514505@kernel.org
Replace the open coded implementation with the new get/put_user_inline()
helpers. This might be replaced by a regular get/put_user(), but that needs
a proper performance evaluation.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251027083745.736737934@linutronix.de
Commit cec199c5e3 ("futex: Implement FUTEX2_NUMA") introduced the
futex_put_value() helper to write a value to the given user
address.
However, it uses user_read_access_begin() before the write. For
architectures that differentiate between read and write accesses, like
PowerPC, futex_put_value() fails with -EFAULT.
Fix that by using the user_write_access_begin/user_write_access_end() pair
instead.
Fixes: cec199c5e3 ("futex: Implement FUTEX2_NUMA")
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250811141147.322261-1-longman@redhat.com
futex_private_hash_get() is not used outside if its compilation unit.
Make it static.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250710110011.384614-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Fix those:
./kernel/futex/futex.h:208: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'drop_hb_ref' not described in 'futex_q'
./kernel/futex/waitwake.c:343: warning: expecting prototype for futex_wait_queue(). Prototype was for futex_do_wait() instead
./kernel/futex/waitwake.c:594: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'task' not described in 'futex_wait_setup'
Fixes: 93f1b6d79a ("futex: Move futex_queue() into futex_wait_setup()")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250512185641.0450a99b@canb.auug.org.au # report
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250515171641.24073-1-bp@kernel.org # submission
Extend the futex2 interface to be aware of mempolicy.
When FUTEX2_MPOL is specified and there is a MPOL_PREFERRED or
home_node specified covering the futex address, use that hash-map.
Notably, in this case the futex will go to the global node hashtable,
even if it is a PRIVATE futex.
When FUTEX2_NUMA|FUTEX2_MPOL is specified and the user specified node
value is FUTEX_NO_NODE, the MPOL lookup (as described above) will be
tried first before reverting to setting node to the local node.
[bigeasy: add CONFIG_FUTEX_MPOL, add MPOL to FUTEX2_VALID_MASK, write
the node only to user if FUTEX_NO_NODE was supplied]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250416162921.513656-18-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Extend the futex2 interface to be numa aware.
When FUTEX2_NUMA is specified for a futex, the user value is extended
to two words (of the same size). The first is the user value we all
know, the second one will be the node to place this futex on.
struct futex_numa_32 {
u32 val;
u32 node;
};
When node is set to ~0, WAIT will set it to the current node_id such
that WAKE knows where to find it. If userspace corrupts the node value
between WAIT and WAKE, the futex will not be found and no wakeup will
happen.
When FUTEX2_NUMA is not set, the node is simply an extension of the
hash, such that traditional futexes are still interleaved over the
nodes.
This is done to avoid having to have a separate !numa hash-table.
[bigeasy: ensure to have at least hashsize of 4 in futex_init(), add
pr_info() for size and allocation information. Cast the naddr math to
void*]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250416162921.513656-17-bigeasy@linutronix.de
The futex hash is system wide and shared by all tasks. Each slot
is hashed based on futex address and the VMA of the thread. Due to
randomized VMAs (and memory allocations) the same logical lock (pointer)
can end up in a different hash bucket on each invocation of the
application. This in turn means that different applications may share a
hash bucket on the first invocation but not on the second and it is not
always clear which applications will be involved. This can result in
high latency's to acquire the futex_hash_bucket::lock especially if the
lock owner is limited to a CPU and can not be effectively PI boosted.
Introduce basic infrastructure for process local hash which is shared by
all threads of process. This hash will only be used for a
PROCESS_PRIVATE FUTEX operation.
The hashmap can be allocated via:
prctl(PR_FUTEX_HASH, PR_FUTEX_HASH_SET_SLOTS, num);
A `num' of 0 means that the global hash is used instead of a private
hash.
Other values for `num' specify the number of slots for the hash and the
number must be power of two, starting with two.
The prctl() returns zero on success. This function can only be used
before a thread is created.
The current status for the private hash can be queried via:
num = prctl(PR_FUTEX_HASH, PR_FUTEX_HASH_GET_SLOTS);
which return the current number of slots. The value 0 means that the
global hash is used. Values greater than 0 indicate the number of slots
that are used. A negative number indicates an error.
For optimisation, for the private hash jhash2() uses only two arguments
the address and the offset. This omits the VMA which is always the same.
[peterz: Use 0 for global hash. A bit shuffling and renaming. ]
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250416162921.513656-13-bigeasy@linutronix.de
futex_lock_pi() and __fixup_pi_state_owner() acquire the
futex_q::lock_ptr without holding a reference assuming the previously
obtained hash bucket and the assigned lock_ptr are still valid. This
isn't the case once the private hash can be resized and becomes invalid
after the reference drop.
Introduce futex_q_lockptr_lock() to lock the hash bucket recorded in
futex_q::lock_ptr. The lock pointer is read in a RCU section to ensure
that it does not go away if the hash bucket has been replaced and the
old pointer has been observed. After locking the pointer needs to be
compared to check if it changed. If so then the hash bucket has been
replaced and the user has been moved to the new one and lock_ptr has
been updated. The lock operation needs to be redone in this case.
The locked hash bucket is not returned.
A special case is an early return in futex_lock_pi() (due to signal or
timeout) and a successful futex_wait_requeue_pi(). In both cases a valid
futex_q::lock_ptr is expected (and its matching hash bucket) but since
the waiter has been removed from the hash this can no longer be
guaranteed. Therefore before the waiter is removed and a reference is
acquired which is later dropped by the waiter to avoid a resize.
Add futex_q_lockptr_lock() and use it.
Acquire an additional reference in requeue_pi_wake_futex() and
futex_unlock_pi() while the futex_q is removed, denote this extra
reference in futex_q::drop_hb_ref and let the waiter drop the reference
in this case.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250416162921.513656-11-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Getting the hash bucket and queuing it are two distinct actions. In
light of wanting to add a put hash bucket function later, untangle
them.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250416162921.513656-5-bigeasy@linutronix.de
futex_wait_setup() has a weird calling convention in order to return
hb to use as an argument to futex_queue().
Mostly such that requeue can have an extra test in between.
Reorder code a little to get rid of this and keep the hb usage inside
futex_wait_setup().
[bigeasy: fixes]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250416162921.513656-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de
futex_queue() -> __futex_queue() uses 'current' as the task to store in
the struct futex_q->task field. This is fine for synchronous usage of
the futex infrastructure, but it's not always correct when used by
io_uring where the task doing the initial futex_queue() might not be
available later on. This doesn't lead to any issues currently, as the
io_uring side doesn't support PI futexes, but it does leave a
potentially dangling pointer which is never a good idea.
Have futex_queue() take a task_struct argument, and have the regular
callers pass in 'current' for that. Meanwhile io_uring can just pass in
NULL, as the task should never be used off that path. In theory
req->tctx->task could be used here, but there's no point populating it
with a task field that will never be used anyway.
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/22484a23-542c-4003-b721-400688a0d055@kernel.dk
The powerpc user access code is special, and unlike other architectures
distinguishes between user access for reading and writing.
And commit 43a43faf53 ("futex: improve user space accesses") messed
that up. It went undetected elsewhere, but caused ppc32 to fail early
during boot, because the user access had been started with
user_read_access_begin(), but then finished off with just a plain
"user_access_end()".
Note that the address-masking user access helpers don't even have that
read-vs-write distinction, so if powerpc ever wants to do address
masking tricks, we'll have to do some extra work for it.
[ Make sure to also do it for the EFAULT case, as pointed out by
Christophe Leroy ]
Reported-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/87bjxl6b0i.fsf@igel.home/
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Josh Poimboeuf reports that he got a "will-it-scale.per_process_ops 1.9%
improvement" report for his patch that changed __get_user() to use
pointer masking instead of the explicit speculation barrier. However,
that patch doesn't actually work in the general case, because some (very
bad) architecture-specific code actually depends on __get_user() also
working on kernel addresses.
A profile showed that the offending __get_user() was the futex code,
which really should be fixed up to not use that horrid legacy case.
Rewrite futex_get_value_locked() to use the modern user acccess helpers,
and inline it so that the compiler not only avoids the function call for
a few instructions, but can do CSE on the address masking.
It also turns out the x86 futex functions have unnecessary barriers in
other places, so let's fix those up too.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241115230653.hfvzyf3aqqntgp63@jpoimboe/
Reported-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Rename unqueue_multiple() as futex_unqueue_multiple(), and make both
that and futex_wait_multiple_setup() available for external users. This
is in preparation for wiring up vectored waits in io_uring.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To make it more generically useful, augment it with allowing the caller
to pass in the wake handler and wake data. Convert the futex_waitv()
syscall, passing in the default handlers.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
With handling multiple futex_q for waitv, we cannot easily go from the
futex_q to data related to that request or queue. Add a wake_data
argument that belongs to the wake handler assigned.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Move the unqueue and lock_ptr clear into a helper that futex_wake_mark()
calls. Add it to the public functions as well, in preparation for using
it outside the core futex code.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
In preparation for having another waker that isn't futex_wake_mark(),
add a wake handler in futex_q. No extra data is associated with the
handler outside of struct futex_q itself. futex_wake_mark() is defined as
the standard wakeup helper, now set through futex_q_init like other
defaults.
Normal sync futex waiting relies on wake_q holding tasks that should
be woken up. This is what futex_wake_mark() does, it'll unqueue the
futex and add the associated task to the wake queue. For async usage of
futex waiting, rather than having tasks sleeping on the futex, we'll
need to deal with a futex wake differently. For the planned io_uring
case, that means posting a completion event for the task in question.
Having a definable wake handler can help support that use case.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
We need this for validating the futex2 flags outside of the normal
futex syscalls.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
In order to support mixed size requeue, add a second flags argument to
the internal futex_requeue() function.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230921105248.396780136@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
To complement sys_futex_waitv()/wake(), add sys_futex_wait(). This
syscall implements what was previously known as FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET
except it uses 'unsigned long' for the value and bitmask arguments,
takes timespec and clockid_t arguments for the absolute timeout and
uses FUTEX2 flags.
The 'unsigned long' allows FUTEX2_SIZE_U64 on 64bit platforms.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230921105248.164324363@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
The current semantics for futex_wake() are a bit loose, specifically
asking for 0 futexes to be woken actually gets you 1.
Adding a !nr check to sys_futex_wake() makes that it would return 0
for unaligned futex words, because that check comes in the shared
futex_wake() function. Adding the !nr check there, would affect the
legacy sys_futex() semantics.
Hence frob a flag :-(
Suggested-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230921105248.048643656@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
Ensure the futex value fits in the given futex size. Since this adds a
constraint to an existing syscall, it might possibly change behaviour.
Currently the value would be truncated to a u32 and any high bits
would get silently lost.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230921105247.828934099@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
Futex has 3 sets of flags:
- legacy futex op bits
- futex2 flags
- internal flags
Add a few helpers to convert from the API flags into the internal
flags.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230921105247.722140574@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
Now that all architectures have a working futex implementation in any
configuration, remove the runtime detection code.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211026100432.1730393-2-arnd@kernel.org
Mike reported that rcuwait went walk-about and is causing failures on
the PREEMPT_RT builds, restore it.
Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Add support to wait on multiple futexes. This is the interface
implemented by this syscall:
futex_waitv(struct futex_waitv *waiters, unsigned int nr_futexes,
unsigned int flags, struct timespec *timeout, clockid_t clockid)
struct futex_waitv {
__u64 val;
__u64 uaddr;
__u32 flags;
__u32 __reserved;
};
Given an array of struct futex_waitv, wait on each uaddr. The thread
wakes if a futex_wake() is performed at any uaddr. The syscall returns
immediately if any waiter has *uaddr != val. *timeout is an optional
absolute timeout value for the operation. This syscall supports only
64bit sized timeout structs. The flags argument of the syscall should be
empty, but it can be used for future extensions. Flags for shared
futexes, sizes, etc. should be used on the individual flags of each
waiter.
__reserved is used for explicit padding and should be 0, but it might be
used for future extensions. If the userspace uses 32-bit pointers, it
should make sure to explicitly cast it when assigning to waitv::uaddr.
Returns the array index of one of the woken futexes. There’s no given
information of how many were woken, or any particular attribute of it
(if it’s the first woken, if it is of the smaller index...).
Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210923171111.300673-17-andrealmeid@collabora.com
We need to make sure that all requeue operations take the hash bucket
locks in the same order to avoid deadlock. Simplify the current
double_lock_hb implementation by making sure hb1 is always the
"smallest" bucket to avoid extra checks.
[André: Add commit description]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210923171111.300673-16-andrealmeid@collabora.com
Move the wait/wake bits into their own file.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210923171111.300673-15-andrealmeid@collabora.com
Move all the requeue bits into their own file.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210923171111.300673-14-andrealmeid@collabora.com
Move the PI futex implementation into it's own file.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210923171111.300673-10-andrealmeid@collabora.com
Put the syscalls in their own little file.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210923171111.300673-3-andrealmeid@collabora.com
