Several selftests Makefiles (e.g. prctl, breakpoints, etc) attempt to
normalize the ARCH variable by converting x86_64 and i.86 to x86.
However, it uses the conditional assignment operator '?='.
When ARCH is passed as a command-line argument (e.g., during an rpmbuild
process), the '?=' operator ignores the shell command and the sed
transformation. This leads to an incorrect ARCH value being used, which
causes build failures
# make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=prctl ARCH=x86_64
make: Entering directory '/build/tools/testing/selftests'
make[1]: Entering directory '/build/tools/testing/selftests/prctl'
make[1]: *** No targets. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory '/build/tools/testing/selftests/prctl'
make: *** [Makefile:197: all] Error 2
Change the assignment to use 'override' and ':=' to ensure the
normalization logic is applied regardless of how the ARCH variable was
initially defined.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20260309205145.572778-1-aleksey.oladko@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Oladko <aleksey.oladko@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Bala-Vignesh-Reddy <reddybalavignesh9979@gmail.com>
Cc: Chelsy Ratnawat <chelsyratnawat2001@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The 'power_floor' test generates an object with the same name,
but there is no .gitignore file in the directory to add the object as
stated in the selftest documentation.
Add the missing .gitignore file and include 'power_floor'.
Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Some SoCs have firmware support to notify, if the system can't lower
power limit to a value requested from user space via RAPL constraints.
This test program waits for notification of power floor and prints. This
program can be used to test this feature and also allows other user space
programs to use as a reference.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
