tailcall_callback tests a tail call one static subprogram below a callback.
That reaches the later stack-depth rejection, but it does not exercise the
tail-call helper while the current frame is itself a callback.
Add a callback that calls bpf_tail_call directly and expect the existing
"cannot tail call within callback" diagnostic. On an affected kernel, the
load instead reaches the "callback unexpected regs" verifier bug, so the
expected message is absent and the test fails. The existing ordinary
subprogram case remains a success control for legitimate tail calls.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260903144433.1716731-5-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add 2 testcases for callback with tailcall:
1. failure case: callback->subprog->tailcall.
2. success case: subprog with tailcall do not affect
no-tailcall callback.
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260716120157.835937-4-pulehui@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
