fstatat() contains two open-coded copies of makedev() to handle minor
numbers >= 256. Now that the regular makedev() handles both large minor
and major numbers correctly use the common function.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260404-nolibc-makedev-v2-6-456a429bf60c@weissschuh.net
The sys_foo() naming scheme used by the syscall wrappers may collide
with application symbols. Especially as 'sys_' is an obvious naming
scheme an application may choose for its own custom systemcall wrappers.
Avoid these conflicts by using an leading underscore which moves the
names into the implementation's namespace. This naming scheme was chosen
over a '__nolibc_' prefix, as these functions are not an implementation
detail but a documented interface meant to be used by applications.
While this may break some existing users, adapting them should be
straightforward. Given that nolibc is most-likely vendored, no
unexpected breakage should happen. No in-tree users are affected.
These conflicts happen when compiling some of the kernel selftests
with nolibc.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319-nolibc-namespacing-v1-1-33c22eaddb5e@weissschuh.net
The naming convention of the my_syscallX() macros is a bit unfortunate.
They may conflict with application code and the name is very generic.
Switch to __nolibc_syscallX(). The leading underscores place the symbols
in the implementation-defined namespace, avoiding conflicting names.
It is also clearer that these are non-standard extensions from nolibc.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260223-nolibc-namespacing-v1-1-52574ffebb2c@weissschuh.net
Add fstat(), fstatat() and lstat(). All of them use the existing implementation
based on statx().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250428-nolibc-misc-v2-3-3c043eeab06c@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Inclusion of any nolibc header file should also bring all other headers.
On the other hand it should also be possible to include any nolibc header
files
in any order.
Currently this is implemented by including the catch-all nolibc.h after the
headers own definitions.
This is problematic if one nolibc header depends on another one.
The first header has to include the other one before defining any symbols.
That in turn will include the rest of nolibc while the current header has
not defined anything yet. If any other part of nolibc depends on
definitions from the current header, errors are encountered.
This is already the case today. Effectively nolibc can only be included in
the order of nolibc.h.
Restructure the way "nolibc.h" is included.
Move it to the beginning of the header files and before the include guards.
Now any header will behave exactly like "nolibc.h" while the include
guards prevent any duplicate definitions.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250424-nolibc-header-check-v1-2-011576b6ed6f@linutronix.de
