atomic_long_dec_and_lock() has never existed. So drop it from the rules.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
vmalloc_exec() was removed by commit 7a0e27b2a0 ("mm: remove
vmalloc_exec").
So drop it from the rules.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
pci_pool_alloc() and pci_pool_zalloc() were removed by commit
88dee3b0ef ("PCI: Remove unused pci_pool wrappers").
So drop the pci_pool_alloc rules.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
- kmem_alloc() was removed by commit f078d4ea82
("xfs: convert kmem_alloc() to kmalloc()")
- kmem_zalloc() was removed by commit 10634530f7
("xfs: convert kmem_zalloc() to kzalloc()")
So drop the kmem_alloc rules.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
- pci_alloc_consistent() and pci_zalloc_consistent() were removed by
commit 7968778914
("PCI: Remove the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API")
- kmem_alloc() was removed by commit f078d4ea82
("xfs: convert kmem_alloc() to kmalloc()")
- kmem_zalloc() was removed by commit 10634530f7
("xfs: convert kmem_zalloc() to kzalloc()")
- kmem_zone_alloc() and kmem_zone_zalloc() were removed by commit
bae633a4a2 ("xfs: remove xfs_zone_{alloc,zalloc} helpers")
So drop them from the rules.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
A cast on a call to an allocation function that is the body of a macro can
be useful, as it ensures tha the macro is used for allocating objects of
the right type. Add two new rules to ignore the macro case.
Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Remove any GFP_KERNEL arguments found in the new kmalloc_obj-family
helpers. This captures the script used in commit 189f164e57 ("Convert
remaining multi-line kmalloc_obj/flex GFP_KERNEL uses").
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260320175113.work.016-kees@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
This function doesn't return anything any more, so the compiler would
notice any bad error handling before any cocci script would.
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251202193129.1411419-3-briannorris@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
builtin_platform_driver() and others also use macro
platform_driver_register() which sets the .owner=THIS_MODULE, so extend
the cocci script to detect these as well.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250911184726.23154-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The isomorphism neg_if_exp negates the test of a ?: conditional,
making it unnecessary to have an explicit case for a negated test
with the branches inverted.
At the same time, we can disable neg_if_exp in cases where a
different API function may be more suitable for a negated test.
Finally, in the non-patch cases, E matches an expression with
parentheses around it, so there is no need to mention ()
explicitly in the pattern. The () are still needed in the patch
cases, because we want to drop them, if they are present.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
The parentheses are only needed if there is a disjunction, ie a
set of possible changes. If there is only one pattern, we can
remove these parentheses. Just like the format:
- x
+ y
not:
(
- x
+ y
)
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
As other rules done, we add rules for str_yes_no()
to check the relative opportunities.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
As other rules done, we add rules for str_on_off()
to check the relative opportunities.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
As other rules done, we add rules for str_write_read()
to check the relative opportunities.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
As other rules done, we add rules for str_read_write()
to check the relative opportunities.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
As other rules done, we add rules for str_enable{d}_
disable{d}() to check the relative opportunities.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
As other rules done, we add rules for str_lo{w}_hi{gh}()
to check the relative opportunities.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
As other rules done, we add rules for str_hi{gh}_lo{w}()
to check the relative opportunities.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
As done with str_true_false(), add checks for str_false_true()
opportunities. A simple test can find over 9 cases currently
exist in the tree.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
After str_true_false() has been introduced in the tree,
we can add rules for finding places where str_true_false()
can be used. A simple test can find over 10 locations.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
no_llseek had been defined to NULL two years ago, in commit 868941b144
("fs: remove no_llseek")
To quote that commit,
At -rc1 we'll need do a mechanical removal of no_llseek -
git grep -l -w no_llseek | grep -v porting.rst | while read i; do
sed -i '/\<no_llseek\>/d' $i
done
would do it.
Unfortunately, that hadn't been done. Linus, could you do that now, so
that we could finally put that thing to rest? All instances are of the
form
.llseek = no_llseek,
so it's obviously safe.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
As done with str_up_down(), add checks for str_down_up() opportunities.
5 cases currently exist in the tree.
Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240812183637.work.999-kees@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
s/does not use unnecessary/do not unnecessarily use/
Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@toblux.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Add rules for finding places where str_plural() can be used. This
currently finds:
54 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
Co-developed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/fc1b25a8-6381-47c2-831c-ab6b8201a82b@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Commit ff82e84e80 ("coccinelle: device_attr_show: simplify patch case")
simplifies the patch case, as a result, STR is no longer needed.
This also helps to fix below coccicheck warning:
> warning: rp: metavariable STR not used in the - or context code
CC: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
CC: Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>
CC: cocci@inria.fr
Fixes: ff82e84e80 ("coccinelle: device_attr_show: simplify patch case")
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Replacing the final expression argument by ... allows the format
string to have multiple arguments.
It also has the advantage of allowing the change to be recognized as
a change in a single statement, thus avoiding adding unneeded braces.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
A common practice is to grep for "WARNING" or "ERROR" text in the report
output from a Coccinelle semantic patch script. So, include the text
"WARNING: " in the report output generated by the semantic patch for
desired filtering of the output. Also improves the readability of the
output. Here is an example of the old and new outputs reported:
xyz_file.c:131:39-40: atomic_add_unless
xyz_file.c:131:39-40: WARNING: atomic_add_unless
xyz_file.c:196:6-25: atomic_dec_and_test variation before object free at line 208.
xyz_file.c:196:6-25: WARNING: atomic_dec_and_test variation before object free at line 208.
Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
Acked-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Commit 453431a549 ("mm, treewide: rename kzfree() to
kfree_sensitive()") renamed kzfree() to kfree_sensitive(),
it should be applied to coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Weizhao Ouyang <o451686892@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Acked-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
Using kobj_to_dev() instead of container_of() is not universally
accepted among maintainers as an improvement. The warning leads to
repeated patch submissions that won't be accepted. Remove the script.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Acked-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
The ptr_ret script script addresses a number of situations where we end up
testing an error pointer, and if it's an error returning it, or return 0
otherwise to transform it into a PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO call.
So it will convert a block like this:
if (IS_ERR(err))
return PTR_ERR(err);
return 0;
into
return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(err);
While this is technically correct, it has a number of drawbacks. First, it
merges the error and success path, which will make it harder for a reviewer
or reader to grasp.
It's also more difficult to extend if we were to add some code between the
error check and the function return, making the author essentially revert
that patch before adding new lines, while it would have been a trivial
addition otherwise for the rewiever.
Therefore, since that script is only about cosmetic in the first place,
let's remove it since it's not worth it.
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Check that alloc and free types of functions match each other.
Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Print memset() call position in addition to the kfree() position to
ease issues identification.
Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Commit dfd32cad14 ("dma-mapping: remove dma_zalloc_coherent()")
removed the definition of dma_zalloc_coherent() and also removed the
corresponding patch rule for replacing instances of dma_alloc_coherent +
memset in zalloc-simple.cocci (though left the report rule).
Add a new patch rule to remove unnecessary calls to memset after
allocating with dma_alloc_coherent. While we're at it, fix a couple of
typos.
Fixes: dfd32cad14 ("dma-mapping: remove dma_zalloc_coherent()")
Signed-off-by: Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Add vmemdup_user() transformations to the memdup_user.cocci rule.
Commit 50fd2f298b ("new primitive: vmemdup_user()") introduced
vmemdup_user(). The function uses kvmalloc with GPF_USER flag.
Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
Match GFP_USER and optional __GFP_NOWARN allocations with
memdup_user.cocci rule.
Commit 6c2c97a24f ("memdup_user(): switch to GFP_USER") switched
memdup_user() from GFP_KERNEL to GFP_USER. In almost all cases it
is still a good idea to recommend memdup_user() for GFP_KERNEL
allocations. The motivation behind altering memdup_user() to GFP_USER:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/6/333
Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Check for memset()/memzero_explicit() followed by kfree()/vfree()/kvfree().
Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
There is a typo in rule r2. Position p1 should be attached to kzalloc()
call.
Fixes: 29a36d4dec ("scripts/coccinelle: improve the coverage of some semantic patches")
Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
