The monitor container source files contained a declaration and a
definition for the rv_monitor variable. The former is superfluous and
can be removed.
Remove the variable declaration from the template as well as the
existing monitor containers.
Reviewed-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251126104241.291258-9-gmonaco@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Add 2 per-task monitors as part of the sched model:
* nrp: need-resched preempts
Monitor to ensure preemption requires need resched.
* sssw: set state sleep and wakeup
Monitor to ensure sched_set_state to sleepable leads to sleeping and
sleeping tasks require wakeup.
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Tomas Glozar <tglozar@redhat.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <jlelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250728135022.255578-9-gmonaco@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Monitors generated with dot2k have their registration function (the one
called during monitor initialisation) return always 0, even if the
registration failed on RV side.
This can hide potential errors.
Return the value returned by the RV register function.
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Tomas Glozar <tglozar@redhat.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <jlelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250723161240.194860-6-gmonaco@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Monitors describing complex systems, such as the scheduler, can easily
grow to the point where they are just hard to understand because of the
many possible state transitions.
Often it is possible to break such descriptions into smaller monitors,
sharing some or all events. Enabling those smaller monitors concurrently
is, in fact, testing the system as if we had one single larger monitor.
Splitting models into multiple specification is not only easier to
understand, but gives some more clues when we see errors.
Add the possibility to create container monitors, whose only purpose is
to host other nested monitors. Enabling a container monitor enables all
nested ones, but it's still possible to enable nested monitors
independently.
Add the sched monitor as first container, for now empty.
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250305140406.350227-3-gmonaco@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
