The i915_utils.h and intel_display_utils.h were in some cases included
from the same files, the former via i915_drv.h and the latter
directly. This lead to a clash between MISSING_CASE() and
fetch_and_zero() defined in both, requiring ifdefs.
With the display dependency on i915_drv.h removed, we can also remove
the now unnecessary ifdefs.
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/f40a1fd365cbcfb77bd76ce0041c4523699f6052.1767009044.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
The remaining utils display needs from i915_utils.h are primarily
MISSING_CASE() and fetch_and_zero(), with a couple of
i915_inject_probe_failure() uses.
To avoid excessive churn, add duplicates of MISSING_CASE() and
fetch_and_zero() to intel_display_utils.h, and switch display to use the
display utils.
As long as there are display files that include i915_drv.h, which
includes i915_utils.h, we'll need #ifndef guards for MISSING_CASE() and
fetch_and_zero() in both utils headers. We can remove them once display
no longer depends on i915_drv.h.
A couple of files in display still need i915_utils.h for
i915_inject_probe_failure(). Annotate this. They will be handled
separately.
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/79f9e31ca64c8c045834d48e20ceb0c515d1e9e1.1761146196.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Add intel_display_utils.c for display utilities that need more than a
header.
Start off with intel_display_run_as_guest(). The implementation is
intentional duplication of the i915_utils.h i915_run_as_guest(), with
the idea that it's small enough to not matter.
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/469f9c41e0c3e3099314a3cf1a7671bf36ec8ffd.1761146196.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
