Add .framebuffer_init, .framebuffer_fini and .framebuffer_lookup to the
bo parent interface. While they're about framebuffers, they're
specifically about framebuffer objects, so the bo interface is a good
enough fit, and there's no need to add another interface struct.
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/848d32a44bf844cba3d66e44ba9f20bea4a8352d.1773238670.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Continue i915 and xe separation from display by moving the bo calls to
the display parent interface. Instead of adding all these functions to
intel_parent.[ch], reuse the now vacated intel_bo.[ch], and avoid mass
renames to calls of these functions. This is similar to
intel_display_rpm.[ch].
Make many of the hooks optional to avoid having to implement dummy
functions in xe. Indeed now we can remove many of the existing dummy
functions.
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/7899eef2ccf0cd603df69099df065226a0df917b.1773238670.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Move the get/put/ref/flush_for_display calls to the display parent
interface.
For i915, move the hooks next to the other i915 core frontbuffer code in
i915_gem_object_frontbuffer.c. For xe, add new file xe_frontbuffer.c for
the same.
Note: The intel_frontbuffer_flush() calls from
i915_gem_object_frontbuffer.c will partially route back to i915 core via
the parent interface. This is less than stellar.
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/f69b967ed82bbcfd60ffa77ba197b26a1399f09f.1772475391.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Add intel_bo_key_check() next to intel_bo_is_protected() where it feels
like it belongs, and drop the extra pxp compat header.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251201172730.2154668-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
The current attempted split between xe/i915 vs. display
for intel_frontbuffer is a mess:
- the i915 rcu leaks through the interface to the display side
- the obj->frontbuffer write-side is now protected by a display
specific spinlock even though the actual obj->framebuffer
pointer lives in a i915 specific structure
- the kref is getting poked directly from both sides
- i915_active is still on the display side
Clean up the mess by moving everything about the frontbuffer
lifetime management to the i915/xe side:
- the rcu usage is now completely contained in i915
- frontbuffer_lock is moved into i915
- kref is on the i915/xe side (xe needs the refcount as well
due to intel_frontbuffer_queue_flush()->intel_frontbuffer_ref())
- the bo (and its refcounting) is no longer on the display side
- i915_active is contained in i915
I was pondering whether we could do this in some kind of smaller
steps, and perhaps we could, but it would probably have to start
with a bunch of reverts (which for sure won't go cleanly anymore).
So not convinced it's worth the hassle.
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016185408.22735-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Convert intel_bo_flush_if_display() to be an operation on the
frontbuffer object rather than the underlying gem bo. This
will help with cleaning up the frontbuffer xe/i915 vs. display
split.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016185408.22735-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
intel_bo.[ch] is not the appropriate location for the panic
functionality. Split out intel_panic.[ch] and xe_panic.c in i915 and
xe. Keep the function names for now.
Cc: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@redhat.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d98b831a011a028ffd33ce99b0ba62be061ee235.1756835342.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Implement both functions for i915 and xe, they prepare the work for
drm_panic support.
They both use kmap_try_from_panic(), and map one page at a time, to
write the panic screen on the framebuffer.
Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250624091501.257661-8-jfalempe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
Encapsulate the struct intel_framebuffer into an xe_framebuffer
or i915_framebuffer, and allow to add specific fields for each
variant for the panic use-case.
This is particularly needed to have a struct xe_res_cursor available
to support drm panic on discrete GPU.
Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250624091501.257661-7-jfalempe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
The display code needs to deal with gem objects, and mostly uses struct
drm_i915_gem_object. That's not great, because for xe we need to
redefine it struct xe_bo during build.
Start a common interface using struct drm_gem_object, with separate
implementations for i915 and xe. For starters, convert i9xx_wm.c to use
it.
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/df6867523a0b5fdd4eb63f657f545603ae6f6e0b.1726589119.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
