mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-24 15:12:13 +02:00
cifs: fix session state transition to avoid use-after-free issue
We switch session state to SES_EXITING without cifs_tcp_ses_lock now,
it may lead to potential use-after-free issue.
Consider the following execution processes:
Thread 1:
__cifs_put_smb_ses()
spin_lock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock)
if (--ses->ses_count > 0)
spin_unlock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock)
return
spin_unlock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock)
---> **GAP**
spin_lock(&ses->ses_lock)
if (ses->ses_status == SES_GOOD)
ses->ses_status = SES_EXITING
spin_unlock(&ses->ses_lock)
Thread 2:
cifs_find_smb_ses()
spin_lock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock)
list_for_each_entry(ses, ...)
spin_lock(&ses->ses_lock)
if (ses->ses_status == SES_EXITING)
spin_unlock(&ses->ses_lock)
continue
...
spin_unlock(&ses->ses_lock)
if (ret)
cifs_smb_ses_inc_refcount(ret)
spin_unlock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock)
If thread 1 is preempted in the gap and thread 2 start executing, thread 2
will get the session, and soon thread 1 will switch the session state to
SES_EXITING and start releasing it, even though thread 1 had increased the
session's refcount and still uses it.
So switch session state under cifs_tcp_ses_lock to eliminate this gap.
Signed-off-by: Winston Wen <wentao@uniontech.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a507db1d8f
commit
ff7d80a9f2
|
|
@ -1967,15 +1967,16 @@ void __cifs_put_smb_ses(struct cifs_ses *ses)
|
|||
spin_unlock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_lock(&ses->ses_lock);
|
||||
if (ses->ses_status == SES_GOOD)
|
||||
ses->ses_status = SES_EXITING;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&ses->ses_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* ses_count can never go negative */
|
||||
WARN_ON(ses->ses_count < 0);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&ses->ses_lock);
|
||||
if (ses->ses_status == SES_GOOD)
|
||||
ses->ses_status = SES_EXITING;
|
||||
|
||||
if (ses->ses_status == SES_EXITING && server->ops->logoff) {
|
||||
spin_unlock(&ses->ses_lock);
|
||||
cifs_free_ipc(ses);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user