From fb6988b83b4cafe8db63999c1ddff1b7c66d2ff5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Florian Schmaus Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 10:48:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] kunit: fix use-after-free in debugfs when using kunit.filter When the kernel is booted with a kunit filter (e.g., kunit.filter="speed!=slow"), the kunit executor dynamically allocates copies of the filtered test suites using kmalloc/kmemdup. During the initial boot execution, kunit_debugfs_create_suite() creates debugfs files (such as /sys/kernel/debug/kunit//run) and permanently stores a pointer to the dynamically allocated suite in the inode's i_private field. Previously, the executor freed this dynamically allocated suite_set immediately after executing the boot-time tests. Because the debugfs nodes were not destroyed, any subsequent interaction with the debugfs `run` file from userspace triggered a use-after-free (UAF). On systems with architectural capabilities, like CHERI RISC-V, this resulted in an immediate fatal hardware exception due to the invalidation of the capability tags on the reclaimed memory. On other architectures, it resulted in silent memory corruption. Fix this UAF by properly coupling the lifetime of the filtered suite memory allocation to the lifetime of the kunit subsystem and its associated VFS nodes. Ownership of the boot-time suite_set is now transferred to a global tracker ('kunit_boot_suites'), and the memory is cleanly released in kunit_exit() during module teardown. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260507084854.233984-1-florian.schmaus@codasip.com Fixes: e2219db280e3 ("kunit: add debugfs /sys/kernel/debug/kunit//results display") Signed-off-by: Florian Schmaus Reviewed-by: Martin Kaiser Reviewed-by: David Gow Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan --- include/kunit/test.h | 1 + lib/kunit/executor.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- lib/kunit/test.c | 1 + 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 9cd1594ab697..ce0573e196ce 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -613,6 +613,7 @@ unsigned long kunit_vm_mmap(struct kunit *test, struct file *file, unsigned long offset); void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test); +void kunit_free_boot_suites(void); void __printf(2, 3) kunit_log_append(struct string_stream *log, const char *fmt, ...); diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c index 1fef217de11d..b0f8a41d61d3 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -15,6 +15,16 @@ extern struct kunit_suite * const __kunit_suites_end[]; extern struct kunit_suite * const __kunit_init_suites_start[]; extern struct kunit_suite * const __kunit_init_suites_end[]; +static struct kunit_suite_set kunit_boot_suites; + +void kunit_free_boot_suites(void) +{ + if (kunit_boot_suites.start) { + kunit_free_suite_set(kunit_boot_suites); + kunit_boot_suites = (struct kunit_suite_set){ NULL, NULL }; + } +} + static char *action_param; module_param_named(action, action_param, charp, 0400); @@ -411,9 +421,12 @@ int kunit_run_all_tests(void) pr_err("kunit executor: unknown action '%s'\n", action_param); free_out: - if (filter_glob_param || filter_param) - kunit_free_suite_set(suite_set); - else if (init_num_suites > 0) + if (filter_glob_param || filter_param) { + if (err) + kunit_free_suite_set(suite_set); + else + kunit_boot_suites = suite_set; + } else if (init_num_suites > 0) /* Don't use kunit_free_suite_set because suites aren't individually allocated */ kfree(suite_set.start); diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index 41e1c89799b6..99773e000e1b 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -1075,6 +1075,7 @@ static void __exit kunit_exit(void) kunit_bus_shutdown(); kunit_debugfs_cleanup(); + kunit_free_boot_suites(); } module_exit(kunit_exit);