github-mirror/linux
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git synced 2026-05-28 09:04:39 +02:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity Graph

selftests: fib-onlink: Add test cases for nexthop device mismatch

Browse Source 
Add test cases that verify that when the "onlink" keyword is specified,
both address families (with and without VRF) accept routes with a
gateway address that is reachable via a different interface than the one
specified.

Output without "ipv6: Allow for nexthop device mismatch with "onlink"":

 # ./fib-onlink-tests.sh | grep mismatch
 TEST: nexthop device mismatch                             [ OK ]
 TEST: nexthop device mismatch                             [ OK ]
 TEST: nexthop device mismatch                             [FAIL]
 TEST: nexthop device mismatch                             [FAIL]

Output with "ipv6: Allow for nexthop device mismatch with "onlink"":

 # ./fib-onlink-tests.sh | grep mismatch
 TEST: nexthop device mismatch                             [ OK ]
 TEST: nexthop device mismatch                             [ OK ]
 TEST: nexthop device mismatch                             [ OK ]
 TEST: nexthop device mismatch                             [ OK ]

That is, the IPv4 tests were always passing, but the IPv6 ones only pass
after the specified patch.

Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260111120813.159799-6-idosch@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Ido Schimmel 2026-01-11 14:08:13 +02:00 committed by Jakub Kicinski
parent b853b94e84
commit f8f9ee9d8b
1 changed files with 8 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
tools/testing/selftests/net/fib-onlink-tests.sh
View File

@ -271,11 +271,15 @@ valid_onlink_ipv4()
run_ip 254 ${TEST_NET4[1]}.1 ${CONGW[1]} ${NETIFS[p1]} 0 "unicast connected"
run_ip 254 ${TEST_NET4[1]}.2 ${RECGW4[1]} ${NETIFS[p1]} 0 "unicast recursive"
run_ip 254 ${TEST_NET4[1]}.9 ${CONGW[1]} ${NETIFS[p3]} 0 \
"nexthop device mismatch"
log_subsection "VRF ${VRF}"
run_ip ${VRF_TABLE} ${TEST_NET4[2]}.1 ${CONGW[3]} ${NETIFS[p5]} 0 "unicast connected"
run_ip ${VRF_TABLE} ${TEST_NET4[2]}.2 ${RECGW4[2]} ${NETIFS[p5]} 0 "unicast recursive"
run_ip ${VRF_TABLE} ${TEST_NET4[2]}.10 ${CONGW[3]} ${NETIFS[p7]} 0 \
"nexthop device mismatch"
log_subsection "VRF device, PBR table"
@ -366,12 +370,16 @@ valid_onlink_ipv6()
run_ip6 254 ${TEST_NET6[1]}::1 ${V6ADDRS[p1]/::*}::64 ${NETIFS[p1]} 0 "unicast connected"
run_ip6 254 ${TEST_NET6[1]}::2 ${RECGW6[1]} ${NETIFS[p1]} 0 "unicast recursive"
run_ip6 254 ${TEST_NET6[1]}::3 ::ffff:${TEST_NET4IN6[1]} ${NETIFS[p1]} 0 "v4-mapped"
run_ip6 254 ${TEST_NET6[1]}::a ${V6ADDRS[p1]/::*}::64 ${NETIFS[p3]} 0 \
"nexthop device mismatch"
log_subsection "VRF ${VRF}"
run_ip6 ${VRF_TABLE} ${TEST_NET6[2]}::1 ${V6ADDRS[p5]/::*}::64 ${NETIFS[p5]} 0 "unicast connected"
run_ip6 ${VRF_TABLE} ${TEST_NET6[2]}::2 ${RECGW6[2]} ${NETIFS[p5]} 0 "unicast recursive"
run_ip6 ${VRF_TABLE} ${TEST_NET6[2]}::3 ::ffff:${TEST_NET4IN6[2]} ${NETIFS[p5]} 0 "v4-mapped"
run_ip6 ${VRF_TABLE} ${TEST_NET6[2]}::b ${V6ADDRS[p5]/::*}::64 \
${NETIFS[p7]} 0 "nexthop device mismatch"
log_subsection "VRF device, PBR table"