mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-30 10:04:04 +02:00
tcp: tcp_time_to_recover() cleanup
tcp_time_to_recover() does not need the @flag argument. Its first parameter can be marked const, and of tcp_sock type. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250618091246.1260322-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c7d78566bb
commit
f64bd2045d
|
|
@ -2336,10 +2336,8 @@ static bool tcp_check_sack_reneging(struct sock *sk, int *ack_flag)
|
|||
* Main question: may we further continue forward transmission
|
||||
* with the same cwnd?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static bool tcp_time_to_recover(struct sock *sk, int flag)
|
||||
static bool tcp_time_to_recover(const struct tcp_sock *tp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Has loss detection marked at least one packet lost? */
|
||||
return tp->lost_out != 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -3013,7 +3011,7 @@ static void tcp_fastretrans_alert(struct sock *sk, const u32 prior_snd_una,
|
|||
|
||||
tcp_identify_packet_loss(sk, ack_flag);
|
||||
if (icsk->icsk_ca_state != TCP_CA_Recovery) {
|
||||
if (!tcp_time_to_recover(sk, flag))
|
||||
if (!tcp_time_to_recover(tp))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
/* Undo reverts the recovery state. If loss is evident,
|
||||
* starts a new recovery (e.g. reordering then loss);
|
||||
|
|
@ -3042,7 +3040,7 @@ static void tcp_fastretrans_alert(struct sock *sk, const u32 prior_snd_una,
|
|||
tcp_try_undo_dsack(sk);
|
||||
|
||||
tcp_identify_packet_loss(sk, ack_flag);
|
||||
if (!tcp_time_to_recover(sk, flag)) {
|
||||
if (!tcp_time_to_recover(tp)) {
|
||||
tcp_try_to_open(sk, flag);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user