mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-30 01:53:29 +02:00
drm/i915/sbi: add a dedicated mutex for LPT/WPT IOSF sideband
The LPT/WPT IOSF sideband is unrelated to pcode or VLV/CHV IOSF sideband. It's just confusing to piggyback on the same mutex. Add a dedicated lock with init and cleanup functions. Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/139933094fe51fccdbe14d4e20df69782e801905.1730193891.git.jani.nikula@intel.com Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d519f48b2f
commit
f270857385
|
|
@ -104,6 +104,7 @@
|
|||
#include "intel_pci_config.h"
|
||||
#include "intel_pcode.h"
|
||||
#include "intel_region_ttm.h"
|
||||
#include "intel_sbi.h"
|
||||
#include "vlv_suspend.h"
|
||||
|
||||
static const struct drm_driver i915_drm_driver;
|
||||
|
|
@ -231,6 +232,7 @@ static int i915_driver_early_probe(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
|
|||
spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
|
||||
spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->gpu_error.lock);
|
||||
|
||||
intel_sbi_init(dev_priv);
|
||||
mutex_init(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
|
||||
cpu_latency_qos_add_request(&dev_priv->sb_qos, PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -292,6 +294,7 @@ static void i915_driver_late_release(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
|
|||
|
||||
cpu_latency_qos_remove_request(&dev_priv->sb_qos);
|
||||
mutex_destroy(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
|
||||
intel_sbi_fini(dev_priv);
|
||||
|
||||
i915_params_free(&dev_priv->params);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -236,6 +236,9 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
|
|||
spinlock_t irq_lock;
|
||||
bool irqs_enabled;
|
||||
|
||||
/* LPT/WPT IOSF sideband protection */
|
||||
struct mutex sbi_lock;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Sideband mailbox protection */
|
||||
struct mutex sb_lock;
|
||||
struct pm_qos_request sb_qos;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ static int intel_sbi_rw(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u16 reg,
|
|||
struct intel_uncore *uncore = &i915->uncore;
|
||||
u32 cmd;
|
||||
|
||||
lockdep_assert_held(&i915->sb_lock);
|
||||
lockdep_assert_held(&i915->sbi_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (intel_wait_for_register_fw(uncore,
|
||||
SBI_CTL_STAT, SBI_BUSY, 0,
|
||||
|
|
@ -59,12 +59,12 @@ static int intel_sbi_rw(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u16 reg,
|
|||
|
||||
void intel_sbi_lock(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
|
||||
{
|
||||
mutex_lock(&i915->sb_lock);
|
||||
mutex_lock(&i915->sbi_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void intel_sbi_unlock(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
|
||||
{
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&i915->sb_lock);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&i915->sbi_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
u32 intel_sbi_read(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u16 reg,
|
||||
|
|
@ -82,3 +82,13 @@ void intel_sbi_write(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u16 reg, u32 value,
|
|||
{
|
||||
intel_sbi_rw(i915, reg, destination, &value, false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void intel_sbi_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
|
||||
{
|
||||
mutex_init(&i915->sbi_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void intel_sbi_fini(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
|
||||
{
|
||||
mutex_destroy(&i915->sbi_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ enum intel_sbi_destination {
|
|||
SBI_MPHY,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
void intel_sbi_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
|
||||
void intel_sbi_fini(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
|
||||
void intel_sbi_lock(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
|
||||
void intel_sbi_unlock(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
|
||||
u32 intel_sbi_read(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u16 reg,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user