mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-24 15:12:13 +02:00
wifi: mt76: add missing lock protection in mt76_sta_state for sta_event callback
mt76_sta_state() calls the sta_event callback without holding dev->mutex. However, mt7915_mac_sta_event() (MT7915 implementation of this callback) calls mt7915_mac_twt_teardown_flow() which has lockdep_assert_held(&dev->mt76.mutex) indicating that callers must hold this lock. The locking pattern in mt76_sta_state() is inconsistent: - mt76_sta_add() acquires dev->mutex before calling dev->drv->sta_add - mt76_sta_remove() acquires dev->mutex before calling __mt76_sta_remove - But sta_event callback is called without acquiring the lock Add mutex_lock()/mutex_unlock() around the mt7915_mac_twt_teardown_flow invocation to fix the missing lock protection and maintain consistency with the existing locking pattern. Signed-off-by: Ziyi Guo <n7l8m4@u.northwestern.edu> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260131035210.2198259-1-n7l8m4@u.northwestern.edu Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3dc0c40d78
commit
f0168f2f9a
|
|
@ -852,8 +852,10 @@ int mt7915_mac_sta_event(struct mt76_dev *mdev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
|
|||
return mt7915_mcu_add_sta(dev, vif, sta, CONN_STATE_PORT_SECURE, false);
|
||||
|
||||
case MT76_STA_EVENT_DISASSOC:
|
||||
mutex_lock(&dev->mt76.mutex);
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(msta->twt.flow); i++)
|
||||
mt7915_mac_twt_teardown_flow(dev, msta, i);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&dev->mt76.mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
mt7915_mcu_add_sta(dev, vif, sta, CONN_STATE_DISCONNECT, false);
|
||||
msta->wcid.sta_disabled = 1;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user