Revert "nouveau/gsp/rm: cleanup remaining IS_ERR_OR_NULL usage"

This reverts commit 1a80c009e2.

Embarassingly, it seems that I completely missed a pretty big issue this
patch causes according to Danilo and Sashiko:

https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2026-May/570353.html

Where it seems this causes some machines to segfault during nouveau probe.

So, revert this for the time being.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260528192847.4077458-2-lyude@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Lyude Paul 2026-05-28 15:27:15 -04:00 committed by Danilo Krummrich
parent 61de054a77
commit ebddb00faa
2 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ r535_gsp_rpc_rm_ctrl_push(struct nvkm_gsp_object *object, void **params, u32 rep
int ret = 0;
rpc = nvkm_gsp_rpc_push(gsp, rpc, NVKM_GSP_RPC_REPLY_RECV, repc);
if (IS_ERR(rpc)) {
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rpc)) {
*params = NULL;
return PTR_ERR(rpc);
}

View File

@ -459,11 +459,11 @@ r535_gsp_msg_recv(struct nvkm_gsp *gsp, int fn, u32 gsp_rpc_len)
retry:
rpc = r535_gsp_msgq_peek(gsp, sizeof(*rpc), &retries);
if (IS_ERR(rpc))
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rpc))
return rpc;
rpc = r535_gsp_msgq_recv(gsp, gsp_rpc_len, &retries);
if (IS_ERR(rpc))
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rpc))
return rpc;
if (rpc->rpc_result) {
@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ r535_gsp_rpc_handle_reply(struct nvkm_gsp *gsp, u32 fn,
break;
case NVKM_GSP_RPC_REPLY_RECV:
reply = r535_gsp_msg_recv(gsp, fn, gsp_rpc_len);
if (!IS_ERR(reply))
if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(reply))
repv = reply->data;
else
repv = reply;