btrfs: fix clear_dirty and writeback ordering in submit_one_sector()

This commit is a replay of commit 6252690f7e ("btrfs: fix invalid
mapping of extent xarray state"). We need to call
btrfs_folio_clear_dirty() before btrfs_set_range_writeback(), so that
xarray DIRTY tag is cleared.

With a refactoring commit 8189197425 ("btrfs: refactor
__extent_writepage_io() to do sector-by-sector submission"), it screwed
up and the order is reversed and causing the same hang. Fix the ordering
now in submit_one_sector().

Fixes: 8189197425 ("btrfs: refactor __extent_writepage_io() to do sector-by-sector submission")
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
Naohiro Aota 2024-10-04 13:53:35 +09:00 committed by David Sterba
parent fe4cd7ed12
commit e761be2a07

View File

@ -1306,6 +1306,13 @@ static int submit_one_sector(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
free_extent_map(em);
em = NULL;
/*
* Although the PageDirty bit is cleared before entering this
* function, subpage dirty bit is not cleared.
* So clear subpage dirty bit here so next time we won't submit
* a folio for a range already written to disk.
*/
btrfs_folio_clear_dirty(fs_info, folio, filepos, sectorsize);
btrfs_set_range_writeback(inode, filepos, filepos + sectorsize - 1);
/*
* Above call should set the whole folio with writeback flag, even
@ -1315,13 +1322,6 @@ static int submit_one_sector(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
*/
ASSERT(folio_test_writeback(folio));
/*
* Although the PageDirty bit is cleared before entering this
* function, subpage dirty bit is not cleared.
* So clear subpage dirty bit here so next time we won't submit
* folio for range already written to disk.
*/
btrfs_folio_clear_dirty(fs_info, folio, filepos, sectorsize);
submit_extent_folio(bio_ctrl, disk_bytenr, folio,
sectorsize, filepos - folio_pos(folio));
return 0;