mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-27 08:33:17 +02:00
selftests/bpf: test cases for bpf_loop SCC and state graph backedges
Test for state graph backedges accumulation for SCCs formed by
bpf_loop(). Equivalent to the following C program:
int main(void) {
1: fp[-8] = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
2: fp[-16] = -32; // used in a memory access below
3: bpf_loop(7, loop_cb4, fp, 0);
4: return 0;
}
int loop_cb4(int i, void *ctx) {
5: if (unlikely(ctx[-8] > bpf_get_prandom_u32()))
6: *(u64 *)(fp + ctx[-16]) = 42; // aligned access expected
7: if (unlikely(fp[-8] > bpf_get_prandom_u32()))
8: ctx[-16] = -31; // makes said access unaligned
9: return 0;
}
If state graph backedges are not accumulated properly at the SCC
formed by loop_cb4() call from bpf_loop(), the state {ctx[-16]=-32}
injected at instruction 9 on verification path 1,2,3,5,7,9,4 would be
considered fully verified and would lack precision mark for ctx[-16].
This would lead to early pruning of verification path 1,2,3,5,7,8,9 in
state {ctx[-16]=-31}, which in turn leads to the incorrect assumption
that the above program is safe.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251229-scc-for-callbacks-v1-2-ceadfe679900@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f597664454
commit
e6f2612f0e
|
|
@ -1926,4 +1926,79 @@ static int loop1_wrapper(void)
|
|||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This is similar to a test case absent_mark_in_the_middle_state(),
|
||||
* but adapted for use with bpf_loop().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
SEC("raw_tp")
|
||||
__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)
|
||||
__failure __msg("math between fp pointer and register with unbounded min value is not allowed")
|
||||
__naked void absent_mark_in_the_middle_state4(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Equivalent to a C program below:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* int main(void) {
|
||||
* fp[-8] = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
|
||||
* fp[-16] = -32; // used in a memory access below
|
||||
* bpf_loop(7, loop_cb4, fp, 0);
|
||||
* return 0;
|
||||
* }
|
||||
*
|
||||
* int loop_cb4(int i, void *ctx) {
|
||||
* if (unlikely(ctx[-8] > bpf_get_prandom_u32()))
|
||||
* *(u64 *)(fp + ctx[-16]) = 42; // aligned access expected
|
||||
* if (unlikely(fp[-8] > bpf_get_prandom_u32()))
|
||||
* ctx[-16] = -31; // makes said access unaligned
|
||||
* return 0;
|
||||
* }
|
||||
*/
|
||||
asm volatile (
|
||||
"call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];"
|
||||
"r8 = r0;"
|
||||
"*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r0;"
|
||||
"*(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = -32;"
|
||||
"r1 = 7;"
|
||||
"r2 = loop_cb4 ll;"
|
||||
"r3 = r10;"
|
||||
"r4 = 0;"
|
||||
"call %[bpf_loop];"
|
||||
"r0 = 0;"
|
||||
"exit;"
|
||||
:
|
||||
: __imm(bpf_loop),
|
||||
__imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32)
|
||||
: __clobber_all
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
__used __naked
|
||||
static void loop_cb4(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
asm volatile (
|
||||
"r9 = r2;"
|
||||
"r8 = *(u64 *)(r9 - 8);"
|
||||
"r6 = *(u64 *)(r9 - 16);"
|
||||
"call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];"
|
||||
"if r0 > r8 goto use_fp16_%=;"
|
||||
"1:"
|
||||
"call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];"
|
||||
"if r0 > r8 goto update_fp16_%=;"
|
||||
"2:"
|
||||
"r0 = 0;"
|
||||
"exit;"
|
||||
"use_fp16_%=:"
|
||||
"r1 = r10;"
|
||||
"r1 += r6;"
|
||||
"*(u64 *)(r1 + 0) = 42;"
|
||||
"goto 1b;"
|
||||
"update_fp16_%=:"
|
||||
"*(u64 *)(r9 - 16) = -31;"
|
||||
"goto 2b;"
|
||||
:
|
||||
: __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32)
|
||||
: __clobber_all
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user