docs: security-bugs: clarify what counts as a valid version

Too often we're getting reports saying "still valid in latest mainline"
with no indication of when this was verified, making this indication
pointless. Let's clarify it and insist on having a version or commit ID,
and that the version must necessarily be for a kernel.org kernel and not
a distro one.

Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260802203540.3453-4-w@1wt.eu
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Willy Tarreau 2026-08-02 22:35:38 +02:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 11f46e30e6
commit e447f7f33f

View File

@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ information is helpful. The following information are absolutely necessary in
**any** security bug report:
* **affected kernel version range**: with no version indication, your report
will not be processed. Note that a time-dependent version such as "latest
mainline" is not acceptable. A stable identifier such as a commit ID or an
exact version is required. Versions designating kernels not coming from
kernel.org (such as distro kernels) are meaningless to maintainers and
will not be processed. A significant part of reports are for bugs that
have already been fixed, so it is extremely important that vulnerabilities
are verified on recent versions (development tree or latest stable