drm/xe/dma-buf: Allow pinning of p2p dma-buf

RDMA NICs typically requires the VRAM dma-bufs to be pinned in
VRAM for pcie-p2p communication, since they don't fully support
the move_notify() scheme. We would like to support that.

However allowing unaccounted pinning of VRAM creates a DOS vector
so up until now we haven't allowed it.

However with cgroups support in TTM, the amount of VRAM allocated
to a cgroup can be limited, and since also the pinned memory is
accounted as allocated VRAM we should be safe.

An analogy with system memory can be made if we observe the
similarity with kernel system memory that is allocated as the
result of user-space action and that is accounted using __GFP_ACCOUNT.

Ideally, to be more flexible, we would add a "pinned_memory",
or possibly "kernel_memory" limit to the dmem cgroups controller,
that would additionally limit the memory that is pinned in this way.
If we let that limit default to the dmem::max limit we can
introduce that without needing to care about regressions.

Considering that we already pin VRAM in this way for at least
page-table memory and LRC memory, and the above path to greater
flexibility, allow this also for dma-bufs.

v2:
- Update comments about pinning in the dma-buf kunit test
  (Niranjana Vishwanathapura)

Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250918092207.54472-4-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Hellström 2025-09-18 11:22:07 +02:00
parent 8b3dfa6fcf
commit df636bf283
2 changed files with 41 additions and 17 deletions

View File

@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ static void check_residency(struct kunit *test, struct xe_bo *exported,
struct drm_exec *exec)
{
struct dma_buf_test_params *params = to_dma_buf_test_params(test->priv);
struct dma_buf_attachment *attach;
u32 mem_type;
int ret;
@ -46,7 +47,7 @@ static void check_residency(struct kunit *test, struct xe_bo *exported,
mem_type = XE_PL_TT;
else if (params->force_different_devices && !is_dynamic(params) &&
(params->mem_mask & XE_BO_FLAG_SYSTEM))
/* Pin migrated to TT */
/* Pin migrated to TT on non-dynamic attachments. */
mem_type = XE_PL_TT;
if (!xe_bo_is_mem_type(exported, mem_type)) {
@ -88,6 +89,18 @@ static void check_residency(struct kunit *test, struct xe_bo *exported,
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, xe_bo_is_mem_type(exported, mem_type));
/* Check that we can pin without migrating. */
attach = list_first_entry_or_null(&dmabuf->attachments, typeof(*attach), node);
if (attach) {
int err = dma_buf_pin(attach);
if (!err) {
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, xe_bo_is_mem_type(exported, mem_type));
dma_buf_unpin(attach);
}
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, err, 0);
}
if (params->force_different_devices)
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, xe_bo_is_mem_type(imported, XE_PL_TT));
else
@ -150,7 +163,7 @@ static void xe_test_dmabuf_import_same_driver(struct xe_device *xe)
xe_bo_lock(import_bo, false);
err = xe_bo_validate(import_bo, NULL, false, exec);
/* Pinning in VRAM is not allowed. */
/* Pinning in VRAM is not allowed for non-dynamic attachments */
if (!is_dynamic(params) &&
params->force_different_devices &&
!(params->mem_mask & XE_BO_FLAG_SYSTEM))

View File

@ -48,32 +48,43 @@ static void xe_dma_buf_detach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
static int xe_dma_buf_pin(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
{
struct drm_gem_object *obj = attach->dmabuf->priv;
struct dma_buf *dmabuf = attach->dmabuf;
struct drm_gem_object *obj = dmabuf->priv;
struct xe_bo *bo = gem_to_xe_bo(obj);
struct xe_device *xe = xe_bo_device(bo);
struct drm_exec *exec = XE_VALIDATION_UNSUPPORTED;
bool allow_vram = true;
int ret;
/*
* For now only support pinning in TT memory, for two reasons:
* 1) Avoid pinning in a placement not accessible to some importers.
* 2) Pinning in VRAM requires PIN accounting which is a to-do.
*/
if (xe_bo_is_pinned(bo) && !xe_bo_is_mem_type(bo, XE_PL_TT)) {
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMABUF_MOVE_NOTIFY)) {
allow_vram = false;
} else {
list_for_each_entry(attach, &dmabuf->attachments, node) {
if (!attach->peer2peer) {
allow_vram = false;
break;
}
}
}
if (xe_bo_is_pinned(bo) && !xe_bo_is_mem_type(bo, XE_PL_TT) &&
!(xe_bo_is_vram(bo) && allow_vram)) {
drm_dbg(&xe->drm, "Can't migrate pinned bo for dma-buf pin.\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
ret = xe_bo_migrate(bo, XE_PL_TT, NULL, exec);
if (ret) {
if (ret != -EINTR && ret != -ERESTARTSYS)
drm_dbg(&xe->drm,
"Failed migrating dma-buf to TT memory: %pe\n",
ERR_PTR(ret));
return ret;
if (!allow_vram) {
ret = xe_bo_migrate(bo, XE_PL_TT, NULL, exec);
if (ret) {
if (ret != -EINTR && ret != -ERESTARTSYS)
drm_dbg(&xe->drm,
"Failed migrating dma-buf to TT memory: %pe\n",
ERR_PTR(ret));
return ret;
}
}
ret = xe_bo_pin_external(bo, true, exec);
ret = xe_bo_pin_external(bo, !allow_vram, exec);
xe_assert(xe, !ret);
return 0;