mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-11-07 06:17:02 +01:00
signalfd: don't dequeue the forced fatal signals
These signals should act like SIGKILL, in that userspace must never dequeue them. But as Kusaram explains, io_uring-driven signalfd_read_iter() called from get_signal() -> task_work_run() paths can do this before get_signal() has a chance to dequeue such a signal and notice SA_IMMUTABLE. Change signalfd_poll() and signalfd_dequeue() to add pending SA_IMMUTABLE signals to ctx->sigmask. TODO: we should probably change force_sig_info_to_task(HANDLER_EXIT) to make fatal_signal_pending() true, or add a fatal_or_forced_signal_pending() helper. Then signalfd_dequeue() could just return -EINTR in this case. This also makes sense for get_signal(), which could prioritize a fatal signal sent by (say) force_sig_seccomp(force_coredump => true), just like it already prioritizes SIGKILL. Cc: stable@kernel.org Reported-by: syzbot+0a4c46806941297fecb9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=0a4c46806941297fecb9 Tested-by: syzbot+0a4c46806941297fecb9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/69d122fd.050a0220.2dbe29.001c.GAE@google.com/ Suggested-by: Kusaram Devineni <kusaram@devineni.in> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/adO3HG8bvwRPcmte@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3555409e52
commit
d72e0fb3b0
|
|
@ -48,17 +48,30 @@ static int signalfd_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
|
|||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void refine_sigmask(struct signalfd_ctx *ctx, sigset_t *sigmask)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct k_sigaction *k = current->sighand->action;
|
||||
int n;
|
||||
|
||||
*sigmask = ctx->sigmask;
|
||||
for (n = 1; n <= _NSIG; ++n, ++k) {
|
||||
if (k->sa.sa_flags & SA_IMMUTABLE)
|
||||
sigaddset(sigmask, n);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static __poll_t signalfd_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct signalfd_ctx *ctx = file->private_data;
|
||||
__poll_t events = 0;
|
||||
sigset_t sigmask;
|
||||
|
||||
poll_wait(file, ¤t->sighand->signalfd_wqh, wait);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
|
||||
if (next_signal(¤t->pending, &ctx->sigmask) ||
|
||||
next_signal(¤t->signal->shared_pending,
|
||||
&ctx->sigmask))
|
||||
refine_sigmask(ctx, &sigmask);
|
||||
if (next_signal(¤t->pending, &sigmask) ||
|
||||
next_signal(¤t->signal->shared_pending, &sigmask))
|
||||
events |= EPOLLIN;
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -155,11 +168,13 @@ static ssize_t signalfd_dequeue(struct signalfd_ctx *ctx, kernel_siginfo_t *info
|
|||
int nonblock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
enum pid_type type;
|
||||
ssize_t ret;
|
||||
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
|
||||
sigset_t sigmask;
|
||||
ssize_t ret;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
|
||||
ret = dequeue_signal(&ctx->sigmask, info, &type);
|
||||
refine_sigmask(ctx, &sigmask);
|
||||
ret = dequeue_signal(&sigmask, info, &type);
|
||||
switch (ret) {
|
||||
case 0:
|
||||
if (!nonblock)
|
||||
|
|
@ -174,7 +189,7 @@ static ssize_t signalfd_dequeue(struct signalfd_ctx *ctx, kernel_siginfo_t *info
|
|||
add_wait_queue(¤t->sighand->signalfd_wqh, &wait);
|
||||
for (;;) {
|
||||
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
|
||||
ret = dequeue_signal(&ctx->sigmask, info, &type);
|
||||
ret = dequeue_signal(&sigmask, info, &type);
|
||||
if (ret != 0)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
if (signal_pending(current)) {
|
||||
|
|
@ -184,6 +199,7 @@ static ssize_t signalfd_dequeue(struct signalfd_ctx *ctx, kernel_siginfo_t *info
|
|||
spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
|
||||
schedule();
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
|
||||
refine_sigmask(ctx, &sigmask);
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user