From 02228f6aa6a64d588bc31e3267d05ff184d772eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ricardo Ribalda Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 22:06:02 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: da9211: Use irq handler when ready If the system does not come from reset (like when it is kexec()), the regulator might have an IRQ waiting for us. If we enable the IRQ handler before its structures are ready, we crash. This patch fixes: [ 1.141839] Unable to handle kernel read from unreadable memory at virtual address 0000000000000078 [ 1.316096] Call trace: [ 1.316101] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0xa8 [ 1.322757] cpu cpu0: dummy supplies not allowed for exclusive requests [ 1.327823] regulator_notifier_call_chain+0x1c/0x2c [ 1.327825] da9211_irq_handler+0x68/0xf8 [ 1.327829] irq_thread+0x11c/0x234 [ 1.327833] kthread+0x13c/0x154 Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Reviewed-by: Adam Ward Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221124-da9211-v2-0-1779e3c5d491@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/regulator/da9211-regulator.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9211-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/da9211-regulator.c index e01b32d1fa17..00828f5baa97 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/da9211-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/da9211-regulator.c @@ -498,6 +498,12 @@ static int da9211_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c) chip->chip_irq = i2c->irq; + ret = da9211_regulator_init(chip); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to initialize regulator: %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + if (chip->chip_irq != 0) { ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(chip->dev, chip->chip_irq, NULL, da9211_irq_handler, @@ -512,11 +518,6 @@ static int da9211_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c) dev_warn(chip->dev, "No IRQ configured\n"); } - ret = da9211_regulator_init(chip); - - if (ret < 0) - dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to initialize regulator: %d\n", ret); - return ret; } From f528fe213a6ad21a6e8644dbd5de10dc264a89fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Neil Armstrong Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 12:23:20 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: qcom-rpmh: PM8550 ldo11 regulator is an nldo This fixes the definition of the PM8550 ldo11 regulator matching it's capabilities since this LDO is designed to work between 1,2V and 1,5V. Fixes: e6e3776d682d ("regulator: qcom-rpmh: Add support for PM8550 regulators") Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102-topic-sm8550-upstream-fixes-reg-l11b-nldo-v1-1-d97def246338@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c index 43b5b9377714..ae6021390143 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c @@ -1016,7 +1016,7 @@ static const struct rpmh_vreg_init_data pm8550_vreg_data[] = { RPMH_VREG("ldo8", "ldo%s8", &pmic5_pldo_lv, "vdd-l8-l9"), RPMH_VREG("ldo9", "ldo%s9", &pmic5_pldo, "vdd-l8-l9"), RPMH_VREG("ldo10", "ldo%s10", &pmic5_nldo, "vdd-l1-l4-l10"), - RPMH_VREG("ldo11", "ldo%s11", &pmic5_pldo, "vdd-l11"), + RPMH_VREG("ldo11", "ldo%s11", &pmic5_nldo, "vdd-l11"), RPMH_VREG("ldo12", "ldo%s12", &pmic5_pldo, "vdd-l12"), RPMH_VREG("ldo13", "ldo%s13", &pmic5_pldo, "vdd-l2-l13-l14"), RPMH_VREG("ldo14", "ldo%s14", &pmic5_pldo, "vdd-l2-l13-l14"),