From cbdf1a61dde22c226a776d60ea5bff260b94f653 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Acayan Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 15:44:35 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm670: label the camss ports instead of endpoints Endpoints cannot be pre-defined since commit dcf6fb89e6f7 ("media: qcom: camss: remove a check for unavailable CAMSS endpoint") was applied, probing all endpoint nodes and requiring them to have a remote. There is no sensible remote in the SoC devicetree because camera sensors are board-specific. The ports are meant to be extended by a board devicetree in order to define fully configured endpoints and connect the ports to camera sensors. For nodes that are only meaningful if extended, labels are usually assigned. Label these ports so they can be extended directly. Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue Signed-off-by: Richard Acayan Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260331194437.41041-2-mailingradian@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm670.dtsi | 18 +++--------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm670.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm670.dtsi index c195c79c1c85..1613c66f92b3 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm670.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm670.dtsi @@ -1787,28 +1787,16 @@ ports { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; - port@0 { + camss_port0: port@0 { reg = <0>; - - camss_endpoint0: endpoint { - status = "disabled"; - }; }; - port@1 { + camss_port1: port@1 { reg = <1>; - - camss_endpoint1: endpoint { - status = "disabled"; - }; }; - port@2 { + camss_port2: port@2 { reg = <2>; - - camss_endpoint2: endpoint { - status = "disabled"; - }; }; }; };