arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630: order interrupts according to bindings

The CAMSS DTSI device node, which came after the bindings were merged,
got the interrupts ordered differently then specified in the bindings:

  sdm630-sony-xperia-nile-pioneer.dtb: camss@ca00000: interrupt-names:0: 'csid0' was expected

Reordering them to match bindings should not cause ABI issues, because
the driver relies on names, not ordering.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220509144714.144154-4-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
This commit is contained in:
Krzysztof Kozlowski 2022-05-09 16:47:14 +02:00 committed by Bjorn Andersson
parent 7908dcc8be
commit cb0b685377

View File

@ -1874,23 +1874,23 @@ camss: camss@ca00000 {
"ispif",
"vfe0",
"vfe1";
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 78 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
<GIC_SPI 79 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
<GIC_SPI 80 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
<GIC_SPI 296 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 296 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
<GIC_SPI 297 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
<GIC_SPI 298 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
<GIC_SPI 299 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
<GIC_SPI 78 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
<GIC_SPI 79 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
<GIC_SPI 80 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
<GIC_SPI 309 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
<GIC_SPI 314 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
<GIC_SPI 315 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
interrupt-names = "csiphy0",
"csiphy1",
"csiphy2",
"csid0",
interrupt-names = "csid0",
"csid1",
"csid2",
"csid3",
"csiphy0",
"csiphy1",
"csiphy2",
"ispif",
"vfe0",
"vfe1";