mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-31 18:43:33 +02:00
btrfs: mark all dirty sectors as locked inside writepage_delalloc()
Currently we only mark sectors as locked if there is a *NEW* delalloc
range for it.
But NEW delalloc range is not the same as dirty sectors we want to
submit, e.g:
0 32K 64K 96K 128K
| |////////||///////| |////|
120K
For above 64K page size case, writepage_delalloc() for page 0 will find
and lock the delalloc range [32K, 96K), which is beyond the page
boundary.
Then when writepage_delalloc() is called for the page 64K, since [64K,
96K) is already locked, only [120K, 128K) will be locked.
This means, although range [64K, 96K) is dirty and will be submitted
later by extent_writepage_io(), it will not be marked as locked.
This is fine for now, as we call btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock_bitmap() to
free every non-compressed sector, and compression is only allowed for
full page range.
But this is not safe for future sector perfect compression support, as
this can lead to double folio unlock:
Thread A | Thread B
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------
| submit_one_async_extent()
| |- extent_clear_unlock_delalloc()
extent_writepage() | |- btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock()
|- btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock_bitmap()| |- btrfs_subpage_end_and_test_writer()
| | | |- atomic_sub_and_test()
| | | /* Now the atomic value is 0 */
|- if (atomic_read() == 0) | |
|- folio_unlock() | |- folio_unlock()
The root cause is the above range [64K, 96K) is dirtied and should also
be locked but it isn't.
So to make everything more consistent and prepare for the incoming
sector perfect compression, mark all dirty sectors as locked.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2bca8eb077
commit
c96d0e3921
|
|
@ -1171,6 +1171,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack int writepage_delalloc(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
|
|||
u64 delalloc_end = page_end;
|
||||
u64 delalloc_to_write = 0;
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
int bit;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Save the dirty bitmap as our submission bitmap will be a subset of it. */
|
||||
if (btrfs_is_subpage(fs_info, inode->vfs_inode.i_mapping)) {
|
||||
|
|
@ -1180,6 +1181,12 @@ static noinline_for_stack int writepage_delalloc(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
|
|||
bio_ctrl->submit_bitmap = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for_each_set_bit(bit, &bio_ctrl->submit_bitmap, fs_info->sectors_per_page) {
|
||||
u64 start = page_start + (bit << fs_info->sectorsize_bits);
|
||||
|
||||
btrfs_folio_set_writer_lock(fs_info, folio, start, fs_info->sectorsize);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Lock all (subpage) delalloc ranges inside the folio first. */
|
||||
while (delalloc_start < page_end) {
|
||||
delalloc_end = page_end;
|
||||
|
|
@ -1190,9 +1197,6 @@ static noinline_for_stack int writepage_delalloc(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
|
|||
}
|
||||
set_delalloc_bitmap(folio, &delalloc_bitmap, delalloc_start,
|
||||
min(delalloc_end, page_end) + 1 - delalloc_start);
|
||||
btrfs_folio_set_writer_lock(fs_info, folio, delalloc_start,
|
||||
min(delalloc_end, page_end) + 1 -
|
||||
delalloc_start);
|
||||
last_delalloc_end = delalloc_end;
|
||||
delalloc_start = delalloc_end + 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user