mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-31 18:43:33 +02:00
usb: phy: Initialize struct usb_phy list_head
As part of the registration of a new 'struct usb_phy' with the USB PHY core via either usb_add_phy(struct usb_phy *x, ...) or usb_add_phy_dev(struct usb_phy *x) these functions call list_add_tail(&x->head, phy_list) in order for the new instance x to be stored in phy_list, a static list kept internally by the core. After7d21114dc6("usb: phy: Introduce one extcon device into usb phy") when executing either of the registration functions above it is possible that usb_add_extcon() fails, leading to either function returning before the call to list_add_tail(), leaving x->head uninitialized. Then, when a driver tries to undo the failed registration by calling usb_remove_phy(struct usb_phy *x) there will be an unconditional call to list_del(&x->head) acting on an uninitialized variable, and thus a possible NULL pointer dereference. Fix this by initializing x->head before usb_add_extcon() has a chance to fail. Note that this was not needed before7d21114dc6since list_add_phy() was executed unconditionally and it guaranteed that x->head was initialized. Fixes:7d21114dc6("usb: phy: Introduce one extcon device into usb phy") Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251121-diogo-smaug_typec-v2-1-5c37c1169d57@tecnico.ulisboa.pt Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c77a6544d8
commit
c69ff68b09
|
|
@ -646,6 +646,8 @@ int usb_add_phy(struct usb_phy *x, enum usb_phy_type type)
|
|||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&x->head);
|
||||
|
||||
usb_charger_init(x);
|
||||
ret = usb_add_extcon(x);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
|
|
@ -696,6 +698,8 @@ int usb_add_phy_dev(struct usb_phy *x)
|
|||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&x->head);
|
||||
|
||||
usb_charger_init(x);
|
||||
ret = usb_add_extcon(x);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user