mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-09-23 13:14:02 +02:00
hrtimer: Use hard expiry when updating timers on the same base
Rearming a queued timer with nonzero slack can leave the timerqueue out of order. remove_and_enqueue_same_base() checks the new soft expiry against its neighbours' hard expiries, then stores the new hard expiry in the node without requeueing it. For example, with A at 10 and B at 20, rearming A at 11 with slack 30 passes the neighbour check but leaves A's hard expiry of 41 before B's 20. The same function also caches the soft expiry in base->expires_next when updating or inserting the first timer, giving next-event selection an earlier deadline than the queue head's hard expiry. Set the timer expiry before handling the queue. Use its stored hard expiry for the in-place ordering check and both updates to base->expires_next. The early update is safe because remove_and_enqueue_same_base() runs with base->cpu_base->lock held. The lock keeps the queue stable while hrtimer_can_update_in_place() checks the new expiry against both neighbours. If the check fails, timerqueue_linked_del() removes the node without comparing expiry values before it is reinserted. Fixes:eddffab828("hrtimer: Keep track of first expiring timer per clock base") Fixes:343f2f4dc5("hrtimer: Try to modify timers in place") Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org> Assisted-by: LLM Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260910143442.2018-1-parri.andrea@gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
113a9796ef
commit
c5dcb3aadc
|
|
@ -1263,13 +1263,23 @@ remove_and_enqueue_same_base(struct hrtimer *timer, struct hrtimer_clock_base *b
|
|||
{
|
||||
bool was_first = false;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Updating the sort key while @timer is queued can temporarily
|
||||
* make the tree inconsistent. This is safe under cpu_base->lock:
|
||||
* no other queue operation can observe that state.
|
||||
* hrtimer_can_update_in_place() either confirms that the new expiry
|
||||
* fits between the neighbours or timerqueue_linked_del() removes the
|
||||
* timer without consulting the expiry.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
hrtimer_set_expires_range_ns(timer, expires, delta_ns);
|
||||
expires = hrtimer_get_expires(timer);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Remove it from the timer queue if active */
|
||||
if (timer->is_queued) {
|
||||
was_first = !timerqueue_linked_prev(&timer->node);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Try to update in place to avoid the de/enqueue dance */
|
||||
if (hrtimer_can_update_in_place(timer, base, expires)) {
|
||||
hrtimer_set_expires_range_ns(timer, expires, delta_ns);
|
||||
trace_hrtimer_start(timer, mode, true);
|
||||
if (was_first)
|
||||
base->expires_next = expires;
|
||||
|
|
@ -1280,9 +1290,6 @@ remove_and_enqueue_same_base(struct hrtimer *timer, struct hrtimer_clock_base *b
|
|||
timerqueue_linked_del(&base->active, &timer->node);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Set the new expiry time */
|
||||
hrtimer_set_expires_range_ns(timer, expires, delta_ns);
|
||||
|
||||
debug_activate(timer, mode, timer->is_queued);
|
||||
base->cpu_base->active_bases |= 1 << base->index;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user