From c4261f77cde773bd7046d332e07de4d8ab600235 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tanmay Shah Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 08:58:46 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] remoteproc: xlnx: fix typecast warnings Fix following sparse warnings by using __force attribute: sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:571:20: sparse: sparse: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:749:17: sparse: sparse: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:773:24: sparse: sparse: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:797:25: sparse: sparse: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression >> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:837:49: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) @@ expected void *rsc_offset @@ got void [noderef] __iomem * @@ drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:837:49: sparse: expected void *rsc_offset drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:837:49: sparse: got void [noderef] __iomem * Reported-by: kernel test robot Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202608190009.uCbYi1Y5-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260828155846.2883035-1-tanmay.shah@amd.com Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier --- drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c index 630621288430..a9873a37dd8f 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static int tcm_mem_map(struct rproc *rproc, return -ENOMEM; /* Update memory entry va */ - mem->va = (void *)va; + mem->va = (__force void *)va; /* clear TCMs */ memset_io(va, 0, mem->len); @@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ static struct resource_table *zynqmp_r5_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc *size = r5_core->rsc_tbl_size; - return (struct resource_table *)r5_core->rsc_tbl_va; + return (__force struct resource_table *)r5_core->rsc_tbl_va; } static int zynqmp_r5_get_rsc_table_va(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core) @@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_get_rsc_table_va(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core) return -EINVAL; } - rsc_data_va = (struct rsc_tbl_data *)ioremap_wc(res_mem.start, + rsc_data_va = (__force struct rsc_tbl_data *)ioremap_wc(res_mem.start, sizeof(struct rsc_tbl_data)); if (!rsc_data_va) { dev_err(dev, "failed to map resource table data address\n"); @@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_get_rsc_table_va(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core) return -EINVAL; } - rsc_tbl_addr = (struct resource_table *)r5_core->rsc_tbl_va; + rsc_tbl_addr = (__force struct resource_table *)r5_core->rsc_tbl_va; /* * As of now resource table version 1 is expected. Don't fail to attach @@ -841,7 +841,7 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_handle_rsc(struct rproc *rproc, u32 rsc_type, void *rsc, int offset, int avail) { struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv; - void *rsc_offset = (r5_core->rsc_tbl_va + offset); + void *rsc_offset = (__force void *)(r5_core->rsc_tbl_va + offset); if (rsc_type != XLNX_RPROC_FW_CRASH_REPORT) return RSC_IGNORED;