mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-07-27 17:47:41 +02:00
xfrm: fix sk_dst_cache double-free in xfrm_user_policy()
xfrm_user_policy() clears the socket dst cache with __sk_dst_reset(), i.e. the non-atomic __sk_dst_set(sk, NULL): it reads sk_dst_cache with rcu_dereference_protected(), stores NULL and dst_release()s the old dst. That is only safe if no other thread modifies sk_dst_cache concurrently. For a connected UDP socket that does not hold: the transmit fast path (udp_sendmsg -> sk_dst_check -> sk_dst_reset) resets the cache locklessly with an atomic xchg(). A per-socket policy change racing a send can make both sides observe the same old dst and each dst_release() it, dropping the socket's single reference twice and freeing the xfrm_dst bundle while it is still referenced: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in dst_release Write of size 4 at addr ffff88801897b6c0 by task exploit/155 Call Trace: ... dst_release (... ./include/linux/rcuref.h:109) xfrm_user_policy (./include/net/sock.h:2239 ./include/net/sock.h:2256 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:3053) do_ip_setsockopt (net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1347) ip_setsockopt (net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1417) do_sock_setsockopt (net/socket.c:2368) __sys_setsockopt (net/socket.c:2393) __x64_sys_setsockopt (net/socket.c:2396) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121) Reachable by an unprivileged user via a user+network namespace. Use the atomic sk_dst_reset() so the cache is cleared and released with a single xchg(): whichever side wins releases the dst once, the other sees NULL and does nothing. Behaviour is otherwise unchanged. Fixes:2b06cdf3e6("xfrm: Clear sk_dst_cache when applying per-socket policy.") Fixes:be8f8284cd("net: xfrm: allow clearing socket xfrm policies.") Reported-by: AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Xiang Mei (Microsoft) <xmei5@asu.edu> Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
226f4a490d
commit
c283e9ada7
|
|
@ -3010,7 +3010,7 @@ int xfrm_user_policy(struct sock *sk, int optname, sockptr_t optval, int optlen)
|
|||
if (sockptr_is_null(optval) && !optlen) {
|
||||
xfrm_sk_policy_insert(sk, XFRM_POLICY_IN, NULL);
|
||||
xfrm_sk_policy_insert(sk, XFRM_POLICY_OUT, NULL);
|
||||
__sk_dst_reset(sk);
|
||||
sk_dst_reset(sk);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -3050,7 +3050,7 @@ int xfrm_user_policy(struct sock *sk, int optname, sockptr_t optval, int optlen)
|
|||
if (err >= 0) {
|
||||
xfrm_sk_policy_insert(sk, err, pol);
|
||||
xfrm_pol_put(pol);
|
||||
__sk_dst_reset(sk);
|
||||
sk_dst_reset(sk);
|
||||
err = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user