mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-24 07:03:03 +02:00
selftests/bpf: Skip test when perf_event_open returns EOPNOTSUPP
When testing send_signal and stacktrace_build_id_nmi using the riscv sbi
pmu driver without the sscofpmf extension or the riscv legacy pmu driver,
then failures as follows are encountered:
test_send_signal_common:FAIL:perf_event_open unexpected perf_event_open: actual -1 < expected 0
#272/3 send_signal/send_signal_nmi:FAIL
test_stacktrace_build_id_nmi:FAIL:perf_event_open err -1 errno 95
#304 stacktrace_build_id_nmi:FAIL
The reason is that the above pmu driver or hardware does not support
sampling events, that is, PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT is set to pmu
capabilities, and then perf_event_open returns EOPNOTSUPP. Since
PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT is not only set in the riscv-related pmu driver,
it is better to skip testing when this capability is set.
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240402073029.1299085-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
2a24e24857
commit
c186ed12a8
|
|
@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static void test_send_signal_nmi(bool signal_thread)
|
|||
pmu_fd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, 0 /* pid */,
|
||||
-1 /* cpu */, -1 /* group_fd */, 0 /* flags */);
|
||||
if (pmu_fd == -1) {
|
||||
if (errno == ENOENT) {
|
||||
if (errno == ENOENT || errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
|
||||
printf("%s:SKIP:no PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES\n",
|
||||
__func__);
|
||||
test__skip();
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ void test_stacktrace_build_id_nmi(void)
|
|||
pmu_fd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, -1 /* pid */,
|
||||
0 /* cpu 0 */, -1 /* group id */,
|
||||
0 /* flags */);
|
||||
if (pmu_fd < 0 && errno == ENOENT) {
|
||||
if (pmu_fd < 0 && (errno == ENOENT || errno == EOPNOTSUPP)) {
|
||||
printf("%s:SKIP:no PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES\n", __func__);
|
||||
test__skip();
|
||||
goto cleanup;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user