mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-23 06:31:58 +02:00
x86/microcode/AMD: Handle multiple glued containers properly
It can happen that - especially during testing - the microcode blobs of all families are all glued together in the initrd. The current code doesn't check whether the current container matched a microcode patch and continues to the next one, which leads to save_microcode_in_initrd_amd() to look at the next and thus wrong one: microcode: parse_container: ucode: 0xffff88807e9d9082 microcode: verify_patch: buf: 0xffff88807e9d90ce, buf_size: 26428 microcode: verify_patch: proc_id: 0x8082, patch_fam: 0x17, this family: 0x17 microcode: verify_patch: buf: 0xffff88807e9d9d56, buf_size: 23220 microcode: verify_patch: proc_id: 0x8012, patch_fam: 0x17, this family: 0x17 microcode: parse_container: MATCH: eq_id: 0x8012, patch proc_rev_id: 0x8012 <-- matching patch found microcode: verify_patch: buf: 0xffff88807e9da9de, buf_size: 20012 microcode: verify_patch: proc_id: 0x8310, patch_fam: 0x17, this family: 0x17 microcode: verify_patch: buf: 0xffff88807e9db666, buf_size: 16804 microcode: Invalid type field (0x414d44) in container file section header. microcode: Patch section fail <-- checking chokes on the microcode magic value of the next container. microcode: parse_container: saving container 0xffff88807e9d9082 microcode: save_microcode_in_initrd_amd: scanned containers, data: 0xffff88807e9d9082, size: 9700a and now if there's a next (and last container) it'll use that in save_microcode_in_initrd_amd() and not find a proper patch, ofc. Fix that by moving the out: label up, before the desc->mc check which jots down the pointer of the matching patch and is used to signal to the caller that it has found a matching patch in the current container. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221219210656.5140-2-bp@alien8.de
This commit is contained in:
parent
61de9b7036
commit
ba73e369b7
|
|
@ -330,8 +330,9 @@ static size_t parse_container(u8 *ucode, size_t size, struct cont_desc *desc)
|
|||
ret = verify_patch(x86_family(desc->cpuid_1_eax), buf, size, &patch_size, true);
|
||||
if (ret < 0) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Patch verification failed, skip to the next
|
||||
* container, if there's one:
|
||||
* Patch verification failed, skip to the next container, if
|
||||
* there is one. Before exit, check whether that container has
|
||||
* found a patch already. If so, use it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
} else if (ret > 0) {
|
||||
|
|
@ -350,6 +351,7 @@ static size_t parse_container(u8 *ucode, size_t size, struct cont_desc *desc)
|
|||
size -= patch_size + SECTION_HDR_SIZE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we have found a patch (desc->mc), it means we're looking at the
|
||||
* container which has a patch for this CPU so return 0 to mean, @ucode
|
||||
|
|
@ -364,7 +366,6 @@ static size_t parse_container(u8 *ucode, size_t size, struct cont_desc *desc)
|
|||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
return orig_size - size;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user