ASoC: codecs: tlv320adcx140: use snd_kcontrol_chip() instead of snd_soc_kcontrol_component()

We have very similar name functions (A)(B). Both gets component from
snd_kcontrol, but (A) is used in callback functions which is registered
through snd_soc_add_component_controls(), (B) is used through
snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets().

	(A) snd_soc_kcontrol_component()
	(B) snd_soc_dapm_kcontrol_component()

(B) is using very picky way to get component but using it is necessary in
ASoC. But (A) is just wrapper function to snd_kcontrol_chip(), and directly
using it without wrapper is very common way on ALSA.
To reduce confusions of similar function, let's use common way on (A).

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87ecr6p0tm.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Kuninori Morimoto 2025-10-14 04:24:54 +00:00 committed by Mark Brown
parent d98fdbdf8b
commit b56580c7ba
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 24D68B725D5487D0

View File

@ -612,8 +612,7 @@ static int adcx140_phase_calib_info(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
static int adcx140_phase_calib_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct snd_ctl_elem_value *value)
{
struct snd_soc_component *codec =
snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
struct snd_soc_component *codec = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
struct adcx140_priv *adcx140 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(codec);
value->value.integer.value[0] = adcx140->phase_calib_on ? 1 : 0;
@ -625,8 +624,7 @@ static int adcx140_phase_calib_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
static int adcx140_phase_calib_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct snd_ctl_elem_value *value)
{
struct snd_soc_component *codec
= snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
struct snd_soc_component *codec = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
struct adcx140_priv *adcx140 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(codec);
bool v = value->value.integer.value[0] ? true : false;