From b2ae7f243583e795b1eb3f8977cccfd7e37a8dfc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 11:45:40 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] xfs: fix the lock annotation in xfs_mru_cache_lookup

Name the actual lock.  Unlike sparse, clang wants the annotation to
be correct.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_mru_cache.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mru_cache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mru_cache.c
index d61ec8cb126d..3f3af2e2e31c 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mru_cache.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mru_cache.c
@@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ xfs_mru_cache_lookup(
 	if (elem) {
 		list_del(&elem->list_node);
 		_xfs_mru_cache_list_insert(mru, elem);
-		__release(mru_lock); /* help sparse not be stupid */
+		__release(&mru->lock);
 	} else
 		spin_unlock(&mru->lock);