bpf: Fix incorrect handling of user flags in bpf_percpu_array_update

For BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY map, bpf_percpu_array_update()
is not considering the possibility of a combination of
(BPF_NOEXIST, BPF_EXIST) flags with (BPF_F_CPU, BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) flags.
This causes the (BPF_NOEXIST, BPF_EXIST) flags to lose their effect
in some cases.

For example, using the (BPF_F_ALL_CPUS | BPF_EXIST) flag combination
with bpf_map_update_elem() results in an incorrect EINVAL error
response, even though the flag combination is valid.

This patch fixes the bug by adding proper flag validations and checks.
Before this patch, bpf_percpu_array_update() rejected
BPF_F_ALL_CPUS | BPF_EXIST and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS | BPF_NOEXIST with
-EINVAL. Also the BPF_F_CPU | BPF_NOEXIST were accepted.
After the patch BPF_F_ALL_CPUS | BPF_EXIST is accepted and
BPF_F_ALL_CPUS | BPF_NOEXIST and BPF_F_CPU | BPF_NOEXIST
result in -EEXIST.

This patch also starts returning -EINVAL for (BPF_EXIST | BPF_NOEXIST),
with or without BPF_F_CPU, which was previously accepted.

Fixes: 8eb76cb03f ("bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_array maps")
Signed-off-by: Masoud Aghasi <maghasi@disroot.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20261008120734.1565972-2-maghasi@disroot.org
This commit is contained in:
Masoud Aghasi 2026-10-08 13:07:32 +01:00 committed by Alexei Starovoitov
parent a2e3191f5b
commit a898ff0f3e
No known key found for this signature in database
2 changed files with 6 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -4396,6 +4396,9 @@ static inline bool bpf_map_is_percpu_map(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
}
}
#define BPF_EXIST_FLAGS (BPF_EXIST | BPF_NOEXIST)
#define BPF_CPU_FLAGS (BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)
static inline int bpf_map_check_op_flags(struct bpf_map *map, u64 flags, u64 allowed_flags)
{
u32 cpu;

View File

@ -438,15 +438,15 @@ int bpf_percpu_array_update(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
u32 size;
int cpu, off = 0;
if (unlikely((map_flags & BPF_F_LOCK) || (u32)map_flags > BPF_F_ALL_CPUS))
/* unknown flags */
if (unlikely(((map_flags & BPF_EXIST_FLAGS) == BPF_EXIST_FLAGS) ||
((u32)map_flags & ~(BPF_EXIST_FLAGS | BPF_CPU_FLAGS))))
return -EINVAL;
if (unlikely(index >= array->map.max_entries))
/* all elements were pre-allocated, cannot insert a new one */
return -E2BIG;
if (unlikely(map_flags == BPF_NOEXIST))
if (unlikely(map_flags & BPF_NOEXIST))
/* all elements already exist */
return -EEXIST;