mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-07-27 01:32:21 +02:00
rbd: Reset positive result codes to zero in object map update path
In a reply message to an RBD request, a positive result code indicates
a data payload, which is not allowed for writes. While
rbd_osd_req_callback() already resets a positive result code for writes
to zero, rbd_object_map_callback() does not. This allows a corrupted
reply to an object map update to trigger the rbd_assert(*result < 0) in
__rbd_obj_handle_request(). This happens, because
rbd_object_map_callback() calls rbd_obj_handle_request() ->
__rbd_obj_handle_request() and passes this positive result code. From
__rbd_obj_handle_request(), rbd_obj_advance_write() is called, which
leaves the positive result code unchanged and returns true. Therefore,
the if(done && *result) branch is executed in __rbd_obj_handle_request()
and the assertion triggers.
This patch fixes the issue by adjusting the logic in the
rbd_object_map_callback() path. A positive result code for an object map
update is now reset to zero (similar to rbd_osd_req_callback()), and the
message is subsequently handled the same way as if the result code was
zero from the beginning. Additionally, a WARN_ON_ONCE() is added for
this case.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 22e8bd51bb ("rbd: support for object-map and fast-diff")
Signed-off-by: Raphael Zimmer <raphael.zimmer@tu-ilmenau.de>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9f00f9cf2b
commit
a6c4250b81
|
|
@ -1950,9 +1950,14 @@ static int rbd_object_map_update_finish(struct rbd_obj_request *obj_req,
|
|||
bool has_current_state;
|
||||
void *p;
|
||||
|
||||
if (osd_req->r_result)
|
||||
if (osd_req->r_result < 0)
|
||||
return osd_req->r_result;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Writes aren't allowed to return a data payload.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(osd_req->r_result > 0);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Nothing to do for a snapshot object map.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user