drm: Suppress intentional warning backtraces in scaling unit tests

The drm_test_rect_calc_hscale and drm_test_rect_calc_vscale unit tests
intentionally trigger warning backtraces by providing bad parameters to
the tested functions. What is tested is the return value, not the existence
of a warning backtrace. Suppress the backtraces to avoid clogging the
kernel log and distraction from real problems. Additionally, the
suppression API allows to actually ensure a warning was triggered,
without parsing any kernel logs and keeping them clean.
The suppression check requires CONFIG_BUG enabled.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260514-kunit_add_support-v11-3-b36a530a6d8f@redhat.com
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Maíra Canal <mcanal@igalia.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Carminati <acarmina@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Gow <david@davidgow.net>
Signed-off-by: Albert Esteve <aesteve@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Guenter Roeck 2026-05-14 13:06:39 +02:00 committed by Shuah Khan
parent bbc960d009
commit a5eefd0726

View File

@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <drm/drm_rect.h>
#include <drm/drm_mode.h>
#include <linux/limits.h>
#include <linux/string_helpers.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
@ -407,10 +408,27 @@ KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(drm_rect_scale, drm_rect_scale_cases, drm_rect_scale_case_desc
static void drm_test_rect_calc_hscale(struct kunit *test)
{
const struct drm_rect_scale_case *params = test->param_value;
int scaling_factor;
int expected_warnings = params->expected_scaling_factor == -EINVAL;
int scaling_factor = INT_MIN;
scaling_factor = drm_rect_calc_hscale(&params->src, &params->dst,
params->min_range, params->max_range);
/*
* Without CONFIG_BUG, WARN_ON() is a no-op and the suppressed warning
* count stays zero, failing the assertion.
*/
if (expected_warnings && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BUG))
kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_BUG");
/*
* drm_rect_calc_hscale() generates a warning backtrace whenever bad
* parameters are passed to it. This affects unit tests with -EINVAL
* error code in expected_scaling_factor.
*/
kunit_warning_suppress(test) {
scaling_factor = drm_rect_calc_hscale(&params->src, &params->dst,
params->min_range,
params->max_range);
KUNIT_EXPECT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(test, expected_warnings);
}
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, scaling_factor, params->expected_scaling_factor);
}
@ -418,10 +436,26 @@ static void drm_test_rect_calc_hscale(struct kunit *test)
static void drm_test_rect_calc_vscale(struct kunit *test)
{
const struct drm_rect_scale_case *params = test->param_value;
int scaling_factor;
int expected_warnings = params->expected_scaling_factor == -EINVAL;
int scaling_factor = INT_MIN;
scaling_factor = drm_rect_calc_vscale(&params->src, &params->dst,
params->min_range, params->max_range);
/*
* Without CONFIG_BUG, WARN_ON() is a no-op and the suppressed warning
* count stays zero, failing the assertion.
*/
if (expected_warnings && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BUG))
kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_BUG");
/*
* drm_rect_calc_vscale() generates a warning backtrace whenever bad
* parameters are passed to it. This affects unit tests with -EINVAL
* error code in expected_scaling_factor.
*/
kunit_warning_suppress(test) {
scaling_factor = drm_rect_calc_vscale(&params->src, &params->dst,
params->min_range, params->max_range);
KUNIT_EXPECT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(test, expected_warnings);
}
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, scaling_factor, params->expected_scaling_factor);
}