mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-09-12 04:23:03 +02:00
mm/percpu: avoid IO/FS reclaim in backing allocations
Commit9a5b183941("mm, percpu: do not consider sleepable allocations atomic") allows sleepable GFP_NOIO and GFP_NOFS percpu allocations to take pcpu_alloc_mutex. This avoids premature allocation failures, but it also makes the mutex visible to callers from constrained IO/FS contexts. Thread A calls pcpu_alloc_noprof() with GFP_KERNEL and takes pcpu_alloc_mutex. Since the internal allocation is not constrained by NOFS, it may enter FS reclaim while still holding pcpu_alloc_mutex, creating a dependency like: pcpu_alloc_mutex -> fs_reclaim -> FS lock At the same time, Thread B may already hold an FS lock and then call pcpu_alloc_noprof() with GFP_NOFS. It will try to acquire pcpu_alloc_mutex and block, creating the reverse dependency: FS lock -> pcpu_alloc_mutex This can still form a potential deadlock cycle. Avoid the dependency by restricting percpu backing allocations to GFP_NOIO. The public allocation still uses the caller's GFP context to decide whether it may block, but the internal memory allocations performed while pcpu_alloc_mutex is held cannot recurse into IO or FS reclaim. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260618130414.96383-5-kaitao.cheng@linux.dev Fixes:9a5b183941("mm, percpu: do not consider sleepable allocations atomic") Signed-off-by: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org> Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de> Cc: Shivam Kalra <shivamkalra98@zohomail.in> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
17fcdd8699
commit
8725ae13f0
18
mm/percpu.c
18
mm/percpu.c
|
|
@ -1726,9 +1726,8 @@ static void pcpu_alloc_tag_free_hook(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk, int off, size_t s
|
|||
* @gfp: allocation flags
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Allocate percpu area of @size bytes aligned at @align. If @gfp doesn't
|
||||
* contain %GFP_KERNEL, the allocation is atomic. If @gfp has __GFP_NOWARN
|
||||
* then no warning will be triggered on invalid or failed allocation
|
||||
* requests.
|
||||
* allow blocking, the allocation is atomic. If @gfp has __GFP_NOWARN then no
|
||||
* warning will be triggered on invalid or failed allocation requests.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* RETURNS:
|
||||
* Percpu pointer to the allocated area on success, NULL on failure.
|
||||
|
|
@ -1749,8 +1748,17 @@ void __percpu *pcpu_alloc_noprof(size_t size, size_t align, bool reserved,
|
|||
size_t bits, bit_align;
|
||||
|
||||
gfp = current_gfp_context(gfp);
|
||||
/* whitelisted flags that can be passed to the backing allocators */
|
||||
pcpu_gfp = gfp & (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Allowlisted flags that can be passed to the backing allocators.
|
||||
* Backing allocations under pcpu_alloc_mutex must not recurse into
|
||||
* IO/FS reclaim. Otherwise a GFP_KERNEL caller holding the mutex can
|
||||
* block on reclaim while a GFP_NOIO/NOFS caller holding an IO/FS lock
|
||||
* waits for the same mutex.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Do not pass __GFP_NOFAIL. A small percpu allocation may need many
|
||||
* backing pages, making nofail reclaim too costly under NOIO/NOFS.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
pcpu_gfp = gfp & (GFP_NOIO | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN);
|
||||
is_atomic = !gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp);
|
||||
do_warn = !(gfp & __GFP_NOWARN);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user