mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-06-02 11:33:28 +02:00
spi: don't check spi_controller::num_chipselect when parsing a dt device
Do not validate spi_controller::num_chipselect against SPI_CS_CNT_MAX when parsing an spi device firmware node. Firstly this is the wrong place, and this should be done while registering/validating the controller. Secondly, there is no reason for that check, as SPI_CS_CNT_MAX controls the amount of chipselects a device may have, not a controller may have. So drop that check as it needlessly limits controllers to SPI_CS_CNT_MAX number of chipselects. Likewise, drop the check for number of device chipselects larger than controller's number of chipselects, as __spi_add_device() will already catch that as either one of the chip selects will be out of range, or there is a duplicate one. Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250915183725.219473-6-jonas.gorski@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f3982daccf
commit
83c522fb64
|
|
@ -2427,11 +2427,6 @@ static int of_spi_parse_dt(struct spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_device *spi,
|
|||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (ctlr->num_chipselect > SPI_CS_CNT_MAX) {
|
||||
dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "No. of CS is more than max. no. of supported CS\n");
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Device address */
|
||||
rc = of_property_read_variable_u32_array(nc, "reg", &cs[0], 1,
|
||||
SPI_CS_CNT_MAX);
|
||||
|
|
@ -2440,11 +2435,7 @@ static int of_spi_parse_dt(struct spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_device *spi,
|
|||
nc, rc);
|
||||
return rc;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (rc > ctlr->num_chipselect) {
|
||||
dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "%pOF has number of CS > ctlr->num_chipselect (%d)\n",
|
||||
nc, rc);
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if ((of_property_present(nc, "parallel-memories")) &&
|
||||
(!(ctlr->flags & SPI_CONTROLLER_MULTI_CS))) {
|
||||
dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "SPI controller doesn't support multi CS\n");
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user