mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-31 18:43:33 +02:00
ALSA: core: Fix potential data race at fasync handling
In snd_fasync_work_fn(), which is the offload work for traversing and
processing the pending fasync list, the call of kill_fasync() is done
outside the snd_fasync_lock for avoiding deadlocks. The problem is
that its the references of fasync->on, fasync->signal and fasync->poll
are done there also outside the lock. Since these may be modified by
snd_kill_fasync() call concurrently from other process, inconsistent
values might be passed to kill_fasync(). Although there shouldn't be
critical UAF, it's still better to be addressed.
This patch moves the kill_fasync() argument evaluations inside the
snd_fasync_lock for avoiding the data races above. The handling in
fasync->on flag is optimized in the loop to skip directly.
Also, for more clarity, snd_fasync_free() takes the lock and unlink
the pending entry more directly instead of clearing fasync->on flag.
Reported-by: Jake Lamberson <lamberson.jake@gmail.com>
Fixes: ef34a0ae7a ("ALSA: core: Add async signal helpers")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260420061721.3253644-1-tiwai@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9398511032
commit
8146cd333d
|
|
@ -100,14 +100,18 @@ static LIST_HEAD(snd_fasync_list);
|
||||||
static void snd_fasync_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
|
static void snd_fasync_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
struct snd_fasync *fasync;
|
struct snd_fasync *fasync;
|
||||||
|
int signal, poll;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
spin_lock_irq(&snd_fasync_lock);
|
spin_lock_irq(&snd_fasync_lock);
|
||||||
while (!list_empty(&snd_fasync_list)) {
|
while (!list_empty(&snd_fasync_list)) {
|
||||||
fasync = list_first_entry(&snd_fasync_list, struct snd_fasync, list);
|
fasync = list_first_entry(&snd_fasync_list, struct snd_fasync, list);
|
||||||
list_del_init(&fasync->list);
|
list_del_init(&fasync->list);
|
||||||
|
if (!fasync->on)
|
||||||
|
continue;
|
||||||
|
signal = fasync->signal;
|
||||||
|
poll = fasync->poll;
|
||||||
spin_unlock_irq(&snd_fasync_lock);
|
spin_unlock_irq(&snd_fasync_lock);
|
||||||
if (fasync->on)
|
kill_fasync(&fasync->fasync, signal, poll);
|
||||||
kill_fasync(&fasync->fasync, fasync->signal, fasync->poll);
|
|
||||||
spin_lock_irq(&snd_fasync_lock);
|
spin_lock_irq(&snd_fasync_lock);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
spin_unlock_irq(&snd_fasync_lock);
|
spin_unlock_irq(&snd_fasync_lock);
|
||||||
|
|
@ -158,7 +162,10 @@ void snd_fasync_free(struct snd_fasync *fasync)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
if (!fasync)
|
if (!fasync)
|
||||||
return;
|
return;
|
||||||
fasync->on = 0;
|
|
||||||
|
scoped_guard(spinlock_irq, &snd_fasync_lock)
|
||||||
|
list_del_init(&fasync->list);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
flush_work(&snd_fasync_work);
|
flush_work(&snd_fasync_work);
|
||||||
kfree(fasync);
|
kfree(fasync);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user