mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-09-13 06:17:27 +02:00
selftests/bpf: Add reg-invariants test for speculative pointer arithmetic
An unprivileged socket filter does variable pointer arithmetic on a PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE whose offset collapses to a constant. The Spectre-v1 speculative path used to snapshot the pointer with a const offset and an unbounded r32, which tripped reg_bounds_sanity_check() on the following register move. Mark the test __success_unpriv (the speculative path only runs unprivileged) and flag it BPF_F_TEST_REG_INVARIANTS so the invariant violation becomes a hard load failure. The unprivileged run fails without the verifier fix and passes with it: verifier_bounds/spec_ptr_alu_const_offset @unpriv:FAIL # without fix verifier_bounds/spec_ptr_alu_const_offset @unpriv:OK # with fix Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> Tested-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260819125840.286434-2-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
150aeba624
commit
7ee2f20bf2
|
|
@ -2267,6 +2267,47 @@ __naked void deduce64_from_32_wrapping_32bit(void)
|
|||
: __clobber_all);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Unprivileged variable pointer arithmetic on a PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE whose
|
||||
* offset collapses to a constant. The Spectre-v1 speculative path snapshots
|
||||
* the pointer while its r32 has just been blanked but its offset not yet
|
||||
* synced; the following register move used to trip reg_bounds_sanity_check()
|
||||
* ("const subreg tnum out of sync with range bounds"). With
|
||||
* BPF_F_TEST_REG_INVARIANTS that violation turns into a load failure, so the
|
||||
* unprivileged program must still load.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
SEC("socket")
|
||||
__success __success_unpriv
|
||||
__flag(BPF_F_TEST_REG_INVARIANTS)
|
||||
__naked void spec_ptr_alu_const_offset(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
asm volatile (" \
|
||||
call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \
|
||||
*(u64*)(r10 - 16) = r0; \
|
||||
r1 = 0; \
|
||||
*(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r1; \
|
||||
r2 = r10; \
|
||||
r2 += -8; \
|
||||
r1 = %[map_hash_8b] ll; \
|
||||
call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
|
||||
if r0 == 0 goto l0_%=; \
|
||||
r1 = *(u64*)(r10 - 16); \
|
||||
r2 = 0x40000000; \
|
||||
if r1 > r2 goto l0_%=; \
|
||||
if r1 s> 1 goto l0_%=; /* r1 in [0, 1] */ \
|
||||
r0 += r1; /* ptr += bounded scalar */ \
|
||||
r9 = r0; /* used to trip the warning */ \
|
||||
*(u8*)(r0 + 0) = r1; \
|
||||
l0_%=: r0 = 0; \
|
||||
exit; \
|
||||
"
|
||||
:
|
||||
: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns),
|
||||
__imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
|
||||
__imm_addr(map_hash_8b)
|
||||
: __clobber_all);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check that range_within() compares cnum ranges, not min/max projections. */
|
||||
SEC("socket")
|
||||
__failure __msg("div by zero")
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user